Literature DB >> 8240220

Elevated dark-adapted thresholds in hypopigmented mice measured with a water maze screening apparatus.

J M Hayes1, G W Balkema.   

Abstract

In previous electrophysiological experiments from hypopigmented animals (mice, rats, rabbits), single-unit recordings from both retinal ganglion axons and cells in the superior colliculus have demonstrated an increase in threshold in the dark-adapted state which is roughly proportional to the ocular melanin concentration. In the present study we compared an albino mouse strain which is relatively resistant to light damage and the beige mouse mutant to their wild-type controls in a situation that involved unanesthetized, unrestrained mice as a control to the electrophysiological single unit experiments. We used a six-chambered water maze. Animals were trained to swim to an illuminated ramp until their performances leveled off (about 10 days). The animals were then dark-adapted for 24 h and tested after reducing the luminance level of the water maze. We found that the albino mice failed to find the ramp when the luminance fell to 1.58 x 10(-3) cd/m2 (p < or = .0001), the beige mice failed at 2.00 x 10(-4) cd/m2 (p < or = .0001), and the normally pigmented controls performed to 5.00 x 10(-5) cd/m2 (p < or = .0001). These results support our previous findings that the sensitivity defect in hypopigmented animals is proportional to the degree of ocular hypopigmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8240220     DOI: 10.1007/bf01067442

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Genet        ISSN: 0001-8244            Impact factor:   2.805


  26 in total

1.  Dark and light adaptation in pigmented and white rat as measured by electroretinogram threshold.

Authors:  E DODT; K ECHTE
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Are albino rats night blind?

Authors:  D G Green; P Herreros de Tejada; M J Glover
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  Response properties of horizontal cells in the isolated retina of wild-type and pearl mutant mice.

Authors:  H Suzuki; L H Pinto
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1986-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  [The adaptive behavior of the retina of the mouse].

Authors:  K A Hellner
Journal:  Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-03-17

5.  The retinal pigment epithelium of wild type (C57BL/6J +/+) and pearl mutant (C57BL/6J pe/pe) mice.

Authors:  M A Williams; L H Pinto; J Gherson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Retinal damage by light in rats.

Authors:  W K Noell; V S Walker; B S Kang; S Berman
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1966-10

7.  Visual thresholds in mice: comparison of retinal light damage and hypopigmentation.

Authors:  J M Hayes; G W Balkema
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1993 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.241

8.  Visually evoked eye movements in mouse mutants and inbred strains. A screening report.

Authors:  G W Balkema; N J Mangini; L H Pinto; J W Vanable
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Electrophysiology of retinal ganglion cells in the mouse: a study of a normally pigmented mouse and a congenic hypopigmentation mutant, pearl.

Authors:  G W Balkema; L H Pinto
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Characterization of abnormalities in the visual system of the mutant mouse pearl.

Authors:  G W Balkema; L H Pinto; U C Dräger; J W Vanable
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  8 in total

1.  Dark adaptation is faster in pigmented than albino rats.

Authors:  Darren Behn; Anjali Doke; Julie Racine; Christian Casanova; Sylvain Chemtob; Pierre Lachapelle
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Retinal projections to the subcortical visual system in congenic albino and pigmented rats.

Authors:  M D Fleming; R M Benca; M Behan
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-09-22       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  Dark light, rod saturation, and the absolute and incremental sensitivity of mouse cone vision.

Authors:  Frank Naarendorp; Tricia M Esdaille; Serenity M Banden; John Andrews-Labenski; Owen P Gross; Edward N Pugh
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Virally delivered channelrhodopsin-2 safely and effectively restores visual function in multiple mouse models of blindness.

Authors:  M Mehdi Doroudchi; Kenneth P Greenberg; Jianwen Liu; Kimberly A Silka; Edward S Boyden; Jennifer A Lockridge; A Cyrus Arman; Ramesh Janani; Shannon E Boye; Sanford L Boye; Gabriel M Gordon; Benjamin C Matteo; Alapakkam P Sampath; William W Hauswirth; Alan Horsager
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 11.454

5.  The scotopic threshold response of the dark-adapted electroretinogram of the mouse.

Authors:  Shannon M Saszik; John G Robson; Laura J Frishman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Neuroprotective effects of near-infrared light in an in vivo model of mitochondrial optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Julio C Rojas; Jung Lee; Joseph M John; F Gonzalez-Lima
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-12-10       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Methylene blue provides behavioral and metabolic neuroprotection against optic neuropathy.

Authors:  Julio C Rojas; Joseph M John; Jung Lee; F Gonzalez-Lima
Journal:  Neurotox Res       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 3.911

8.  Hypothermia Prevents Retinal Damage Generated by Optic Nerve Trauma in the Rat.

Authors:  Manuel Rey-Funes; Ignacio M Larrayoz; Daniela S Contartese; Manuel Soliño; Anibal Sarotto; Martín Bustelo; Martín Bruno; Verónica B Dorfman; César F Loidl; Alfredo Martínez
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.