Literature DB >> 8239427

Risks and benefits of using Marlex mesh in chest wall reconstruction.

S S Kroll1, G Walsh, B Ryan, R C King.   

Abstract

The records of 101 patients who had undergone chest wall reconstruction both with and without stabilization of the chest wall by Marlex mesh were reviewed to see if Marlex reduced ventilator dependence and hospital stay, and to determine whether the use of Marlex was associated with any increased risk of infection. In 40 patients in whom Marlex was used, the mean number of days on postoperative ventilator support was 0.8, and mean hospital stay was 9.7 days. In 61 patients in whom Marlex was not used, the mean number of days on ventilator support was 4.9, and mean hospital stay was 17.5 days. These differences were statistically significant (p = 0.03, p = 0.006). Two patients in the Marlex-stabilized group (5%) developed wound infections, but these were preceded by ischemic necrosis of overlying flaps. None of the patients without Marlex developed wound infections. That difference was not statistically significant. We conclude that the use of Marlex in chest wall reconstruction does not significantly increase the risk of wound infection, provided that overlying tissues are properly vascularized and remain viable, and that synthetic mesh does improve chest wall stability and reduce ventilator dependence and overall hospital stay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8239427     DOI: 10.1097/00000637-199310000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Plast Surg        ISSN: 0148-7043            Impact factor:   1.539


  20 in total

1.  Stabilization of the chest wall: autologous and alloplastic reconstructions.

Authors:  Raman Chaos Mahabir; Charles E Butler
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 2.314

2.  [Not Available].

Authors:  A Briccoli; M Manfrini; F Gherlinzoni; N Fabbri; M Mercuri
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.154

3.  Reconstruction of chest wall using a two-layer prolene mesh and bone cement sandwich.

Authors:  Manouchehr Aghajanzadeh; Ali Alavi; Gilda Aghajanzadeh; Hannan Ebrahimi; Sina Khajeh Jahromi; Sara Massahnia
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2013-01-27       Impact factor: 0.656

4.  Chest wall reconstruction and advanced disease.

Authors:  Elisabeth K Beahm; David W Chang
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.314

5.  Dynamic 3D printed titanium copy prosthesis: a novel design for large chest wall resection and reconstruction.

Authors:  Javier Aragón; Itzell Pérez Méndez
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Sternum reconstruction using titanium plates matched with "sandwich" Gore-Tex meshes.

Authors:  Marco Chiappetta; Francesco Facciolo
Journal:  J Vis Surg       Date:  2018-03-12

7.  Aggressive therapy for locoregional recurrence after mastectomy in stage II and III breast cancer patients.

Authors:  E M Mora; S E Singletary; A U Buzdar; D A Johnston
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  Reconstruction of the thoracic wall-long-term follow-up including pulmonary function tests.

Authors:  Adrien Daigeler; Daniel Druecke; Mitra Hakimi; Hans-Werner Duchna; Ole Goertz; Heinz-Herbert Homann; Marcus Lehnhardt; Hans-Ulrich Steinau
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-08-02       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Microvascular reconstructions of full-thickness oncological chest wall defects.

Authors:  Erkki Tukiainen; Pentscho Popov; Sirpa Asko-Seljavaara
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Non-rigid reconstruction of chest wall defects after resection of musculoskeletal tumors.

Authors:  Satoshi Tsukushi; Yoshihiro Nishida; Hideshi Sugiura; Yoshihisa Yamada; Yuzuru Kamei; Kazuhiro Toriyama; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.