Literature DB >> 8239013

The dose of propofol required to prevent children from moving during magnetic resonance imaging.

D D Frankville1, R M Spear, J B Dyck.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravenous propofol offers several advantages as an anesthetic for children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging. However, the dose of propofol required to prevent movement during magnetic resonance imaging is likely to be less than that required for surgical anesthesia.
METHODS: Thirty children between the ages of 1 and 10 years, undergoing elective magnetic resonance imaging as outpatients were randomly assigned to receive a propofol infusion at a rate of 50, 75, or 100 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 during the imaging procedure. Anesthesia was induced with inhalation of halothane, nitrous oxide, and oxygen, and a 2 mg.kg-1 loading dose of propofol. Immediately after insertion of an intravenous catheter, inhaled anesthetics were discontinued and the propofol infusion started. The children then were observed for movement during the scan.
RESULTS: There were no significant differences among the three groups with respects to mean age (4.4 +/- 2.0 yr), weight (17.6 +/- 5.1 kg), induction time (11 +/- 3 min), scan duration (55 +/- 26 min), or recovery time (30 +/- 8 min). Five of ten patients who received 50 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1 moved during the scan, three of ten patients who received 75 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1 moved, and none of the children who received 100 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1 moved. Two patients experienced a decrease of arterial oxygen saturation to less than 95% after receiving the initial bolus of propofol. The arterial oxygen saturation returned to normal within 15 s without specific treatment other than continued supplemental oxygen. There were no episodes of hypoxemia during image acquisition. None of the children experienced nausea or vomiting.
CONCLUSIONS: Following induction of anesthesia with halothane, nitrous oxide, and a 2 mg.kg-1 loading dose of propofol, infusion of propofol at a rate of 100 micrograms.kg-1 x min-1 effectively prevents children from moving during elective magnetic resonance imaging. A transient decrease in arterial oxygen saturation can occur after the initial bolus of propofol. Recovery from anesthesia is rapid and without nausea or vomiting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8239013     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199311000-00013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  9 in total

1.  Low-dose dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to propofol infusion for children in MRI: A double-cohort study.

Authors:  Makoto Nagoshi; Swayta Reddy; Marisa Bell; Allan Cresencia; Rebecca Margolis; Randall Wetzel; Patrick Ross
Journal:  Paediatr Anaesth       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 2.556

Review 2.  Sedation in pediatric patients.

Authors:  S Suresh; S C Hall
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1996 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.967

3.  Hyperintense signal abnormality in subarachnoid spaces and basal cisterns on MR images of children anesthetized with propofol: new fluid-attenuated inversion recovery finding.

Authors:  C G Filippi; A M Ulug; D Lin; L A Heier; R D Zimmerman
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Comparison of Two Different Intranasal Doses of Dexmedetomidine in Children for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Sedation.

Authors:  Aslihan Tug; Ayse Hanci; Hacer Sebnem Turk; Ferda Aybey; Canan Tulay Isil; Pinar Sayin; Sibel Oba
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.022

5.  Propofol for pediatric radiotherapy.

Authors:  Jyotsna Punj; Sushma Bhatnagar; Abha Saxena; Seema Mishra; T R Kannan; Manas Panigrahi; Vipin Pandey
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 1.967

6.  Is procedural sedation with propofol acceptable for complex imaging? A comparison of short vs. prolonged sedations in children.

Authors:  Mark A Griffiths; Pradip P Kamat; Courtney E McCracken; Harold K Simon
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2013-05-07

7.  A comparison of the sedative, hemodynamic, and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Jaydev Dave; Sandip Vaghela
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-07

8.  Complications of three deep sedation methods for magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Solina Tith; Kirk Lalwani; Rongwei Fu
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-04

9.  The practical aspects of propofol target controlled infusion for magnetic resonance imaging in children: An audit from the Royal Marsden Hospital.

Authors:  Emily Haberman; Alex Oliver
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.