Literature DB >> 8238715

Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair.

R E FitzGibbons1, J Hefferon, J Hill.   

Abstract

Fourteen patients underwent percutaneous Achilles tendon repairs between 1982 and 1989 for ruptures approximately 2 to 8 cm from the calcaneal insertion. They were evaluated subjectively (questionnaires) and objectively (physical examinations, Cybex II dynamometer). The minimum follow-up time was 2 years with an average of 3.8 years. Subjectively, all of the patients were satisfied with their overall results. Objectively, no significant difference was demonstrated by Cybex II evaluation at 60 and 120 deg/sec. A significant difference was seen at 180 deg/sec, but this represented only a 13% loss of power. No infections, delayed wound healing, reruptures, or evidence of thrombophlebitis were noted. There was one sural nerve injury.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8238715     DOI: 10.1177/036354659302100516

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  14 in total

1.  Sural nerve injury associated with neglected tendo Achilles ruptures.

Authors:  M D Fletcher; P J Warren
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Percutaneous Achilles tendon repair with and without endoscopic control.

Authors:  Tamás Halasi; András Tállay; István Berkes
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Total Achilles tendon rupture. A review.

Authors:  J Leppilahti; S Orava
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Can platelet-rich plasma have a role in Achilles tendon surgical repair?

Authors:  Angelo De Carli; Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Alessandro Ciompi; Domenico Lupariello; Antonio Vadalà; Giuseppe Argento; Andrea Ferretti; M C Vulpiani; M Vetrano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-03-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Minimally invasive repair of acute Achilles tendon ruptures with Achillon device.

Authors:  Maurizio Valente; Marina Crucil; Vincenzo Alecci; Giovanni Frezza
Journal:  Musculoskelet Surg       Date:  2011-07-20

6.  Locating the sural nerve during calcaneal (Achilles) tendon repair with confidence: a cadaveric study with clinical applications.

Authors:  Joseph A Blackmon; Stavros Atsas; Mackenzie J Clarkson; Jacob N Fox; Blake T Daney; Sean C Dodson; H Wayne Lambert
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 1.286

7.  Open versus percutaneous repair in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: a randomized prospective study.

Authors:  A Gigante; A Moschini; A Verdenelli; M Del Torto; S Ulisse; L de Palma
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-12-08       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Long-term biomechanical outcomes after Achilles tendon ruptures.

Authors:  Claudio Rosso; Daniel M Buckland; Caroline Polzer; Patrick Sadoghi; Reinhard Schuh; Lukas Weisskopf; Patrick Vavken; Victor Valderrabano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 9.  [Postoperative MRI of the ankle].

Authors:  M Sharabianlou Korth; L B Fritz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 0.635

10.  Midterm functional performance following open surgical repair of acute Achilles tendon rupture.

Authors:  Markus Wenning; Marlene Mauch; Albrecht Heitner; Paul Streicher; Ramona Ritzmann; Jochen Paul
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 2.928

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.