Literature DB >> 8238315

Acidification of rat liver lysosomes: quantitation and comparison with endosomes.

R W Van Dyke1.   

Abstract

Both lysosomes and endosomes are acidified by an electrogenic proton pump, although studies in intact cells indicate that the steady-state internal pH (pHi) of lysosomes is more acid than that of endosomes. We undertook the present study to examine in detail the acidification mechanism of purified rat liver secondary lysosomes and to compare it with that of a population of early endosomes. Both endosomes and lysosomes exhibited ATP-dependent acidification, but proton influx rates were 2.4- to 2.7-fold greater for endosomes than for lysosomes because of differences in both buffering capacity and acidification rates, suggesting that endosomes exhibited greater numbers or rates of proton pumps. Lysosomes, however, exhibited a more acidic steady-state pHi due in part to a slower proton leak rate. Changes in medium Cl- increased acidification rates of endosomes more than lysosomes, and the lysosome ATP-dependent interior-positive membrane potential was only partially eliminated by high-Cl- medium. Permeability studies suggested that lysosomes were less permeable to Na+, Li+, and Cl- and more permeable to K+ and PO4(2-) than endosomes. Na-K-adenosine-triphosphatase did not appear to regulate acidification of either vesicle type. Endosome and lysosome acidification displayed similar inhibition profiles to N-ethylmaleimide, dicyclohexyl-carbodiimide, and vanadate, although lysosomes were somewhat more sensitive [concentration producing 50% maximal inhibition (IC50) 1 nM] to bafilomycin A1 than endosomes (IC50 7.6 nM). Oligomycin (1.5-3 microM) stimulated lysosome acidification due to shunting of membrane potential. Overall, acidification of endosomes and lysosomes was qualitatively similar but quantitatively somewhat different, possibly related to differences in the density or rate of proton pumps as well as vesicle permeability to protons, anions, and other cations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8238315     DOI: 10.1152/ajpcell.1993.265.4.C901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Physiol        ISSN: 0002-9513


  16 in total

1.  Regulation of organelle acidity.

Authors:  M Grabe; G Oster
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.086

2.  Acid-inducible proton influx currents in the plasma membrane of murine osteoclast-like cells.

Authors:  Miyuki Kuno; Guangshuai Li; Yoshie Moriura; Yoshiko Hino; Junko Kawawaki; Hiromu Sakai
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.657

3.  Theoretical considerations on the role of membrane potential in the regulation of endosomal pH.

Authors:  S L Rybak; F Lanni; R F Murphy
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 4.  The role of cellular hydration in the regulation of cell function.

Authors:  D Häussinger
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 3.857

5.  Characterization of the swelling-induced alkalinization of endocytotic vesicles in fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran-loaded rat hepatocytes.

Authors:  R Schreiber; D Häussinger
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1995-07-01       Impact factor: 3.857

6.  A cation counterflux supports lysosomal acidification.

Authors:  Benjamin E Steinberg; Kassidy K Huynh; Alexandre Brodovitch; Sabrina Jabs; Tobias Stauber; Thomas J Jentsch; Sergio Grinstein
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 10.539

7.  A mathematical model of osteoclast acidification during bone resorption.

Authors:  Frank V Marcoline; Yoichi Ishida; Joseph A Mindell; Smita Nayak; Michael Grabe
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2016-09-17       Impact factor: 4.398

Review 8.  The known unknowns of antigen processing and presentation.

Authors:  Jatin M Vyas; Annemarthe G Van der Veen; Hidde L Ploegh
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 53.106

9.  Degradation of Alzheimer's amyloid fibrils by microglia requires delivery of ClC-7 to lysosomes.

Authors:  Amitabha Majumdar; Estibaliz Capetillo-Zarate; Dana Cruz; Gunnar K Gouras; Frederick R Maxfield
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.138

10.  A model of lysosomal pH regulation.

Authors:  Yoichi Ishida; Smita Nayak; Joseph A Mindell; Michael Grabe
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 4.086

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.