Literature DB >> 8237760

Valve area and cardiac output in aortic stenosis: quantification by magnetic resonance velocity mapping.

L Søndergaard1, P Hildebrandt, K Lindvig, C Thomsen, F Ståhlberg, E Kassis, O Henriksen.   

Abstract

Valve area and cardiac output were determined with magnetic resonance (MR) velocity mapping in 12 patients with aortic stenosis. Heart catheterization, Doppler echocardiography, and indicator dilution were performed for comparison. Left ventricle could be catheterized in only nine patients; in these cases, MR measured a mean valve area of 1.2 cm2 compared with 0.9 cm2 derived from catheterization data, with a mean difference of 0.2 cm2 between the 2 methods. The limits of agreement were [0.0, +0.5] cm2, less in patients with an important degree of concomitant regurgitation. In the whole material, MR measured a mean area of 1.1 cm2 compared with 1.2 cm2 derived from Doppler echocardiography data, with a mean difference of 0.1 cm2 and [-0.5, +0.6] cm2 as limits of agreement. In 11 patients the cardiac output was quantified by MR to a mean of 4.9 L/min and by indicator dilution to 5.0 L/min, with a mean difference of 0.2 L/min, and [-0.6, +0.8] L/min as limits of agreement. In addition, MR offers the major advance of simultaneous quantification of regurgitant volume in cases of concomitant regurgitation. In conclusion, because the two important prognostic determinants in aortic stenosis--the valvular area and the cardiac output--may be quantified, MR has potential to become a clinical tool in assessment of severity in aortic stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8237760     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(93)90669-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  14 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  M Schmidt; J Crnac; B Dederichs; P Theissen; H Schicha; U Sechtem
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-06

2.  Grading of aortic stenosis severity: a head-to-head comparison between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography.

Authors:  Cesare Mantini; Gabriele Di Giammarco; Jacopo Pizzicannella; Sabina Gallina; Fabrizio Ricci; Emilia D'Ugo; Marziale Marchetti; Antonio Raffaele Cotroneo; Nauman Ahmed; Chiara Bucciarelli-Ducci; Armando Tartaro; Raffaele De Caterina
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  MRI Assessment of Diastolic and Systolic Intraventricular Pressure Gradients in Heart Failure.

Authors:  Snigdha Jain; Francisco J Londono; Patrick Segers; Thierry C Gillebert; Marc De Buyzere; Julio A Chirinos
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2016-02

4.  Imaging and quantifying valvular heart disease using magnetic resonance techniques.

Authors:  George E Gentchos; Marc D Tischler; Timothy F Christian
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2006-12

5.  Efficient method for volumetric assessment of peak blood flow velocity using 4D flow MRI.

Authors:  Michael J Rose; Kelly Jarvis; Varun Chowdhary; Alex J Barker; Bradley D Allen; Joshua D Robinson; Michael Markl; Cynthia K Rigsby; Susanne Schnell
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Qualitative echocardiographic assessment of aortic valve regurgitation with quantitative cardiac magnetic resonance: a comparative study.

Authors:  Shelby Kutty; Kevin K Whitehead; Shobha Natarajan; Matthew A Harris; Gil Wernovsky; Mark A Fogel
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 1.655

Review 7.  Heart valve disease: investigation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Saul G Myerson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 5.364

8.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance evaluation of aortic stenosis severity using single plane measurement of effective orifice area.

Authors:  Julio Garcia; Oscar R Marrufo; Alfredo O Rodriguez; Eric Larose; Philippe Pibarot; Lyes Kadem
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-04-06       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance phase contrast imaging.

Authors:  Krishna S Nayak; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Matt A Bernstein; Michael Markl; Peter D Gatehouse; Rene M Botnar; David Saloner; Christine Lorenz; Han Wen; Bob S Hu; Frederick H Epstein; John N Oshinski; Subha V Raman
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2015-08-09       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 10.  The role of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the detection and monitoring of cardiotoxicity in patients with breast cancer after treatment: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Fatemeh Jafari; Afsane Maddah Safaei; Leila Hosseini; Sanaz Asadian; Tara Molanaie Kamangar; Fatemeh Zadehbagheri; Nahid Rezaeian
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 4.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.