Literature DB >> 8237146

[Importance of tumor growth and spread for surgical radical excision].

C Wittekind1.   

Abstract

Different organ tumours of the gastrointestinal tract show variations in invasion patterns which are partly dependent on the biological characteristics of the tumour and partly dependent on the anatomical situation of the involved organ. It is important for the surgeon to have knowledge of the local invasion behaviours in making a precise indication for surgery, in the planning and in the technical accomplishment of the operation. Residual tumour has been shown to be a particular important prognostic factor. This paper investigates a large series of patients with different organ tumours in order to find in which location a R1 situation must be expected and which surgical consequences should be thus derived. The percentage of R0 resections in all patients who underwent resection differed in the individually examined organs: oesophagus, 65%; stomach, 80%; pancreas, 77%; colon, 81%; rectum, 84%. R1 resections also showed differences in incidence: oesophagus, 17%; stomach, 7%; pancreas, 13%; colon, 3%; rectum, 4%. Residual tumour was most frequently found in the lateral (superficial or free) resection margins: oesophagus, 79%; stomach, 67%; pancreas, 86%; colon, 78%; rectum, 74%. The other resection margins were significantly less-frequently involved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8237146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zentralbl Chir        ISSN: 0044-409X            Impact factor:   0.942


  5 in total

1.  [Tumor classifications].

Authors:  C Wittekind; I Tischoff
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.011

Review 2.  [R1 resection in the surgery of upper gastrointestinal tumors: relevance and therapeutic consequences].

Authors:  F Lordick; K Ott; A Novotny; C Schuhmacher; J R Siewert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  [Problems with residual tumor classification, particularly R1].

Authors:  C Wittekind
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  pTNM and residual tumor classifications: problems of assessment and prognostic significance.

Authors:  P Hermanek
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1995 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  [Regression grading of colorectal carcinoma after preoperative radiochemotherapy. An inventory].

Authors:  C Wittekind; A Tannapfel
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2003-01-15       Impact factor: 1.011

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.