Literature DB >> 8236967

Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling.

L P Shulman1, S Elias.   

Abstract

Amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling have been shown through prospective, multicenter trials to be safe and effective methods of prenatal diagnosis; accordingly, a knowledge of these tests is important for those physicians who care for women during their childbearing years. We review the indications, techniques, safety, accuracy, and efficacy of amniocentesis and chorionic villus sampling and compare the advantages and disadvantages of each diagnostic test. This review should enable physicians to provide appropriate counseling and information to women at increased risk for fetal abnormalities detectable by either of these procedures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8236967      PMCID: PMC1011338     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  West J Med        ISSN: 0093-0415


  26 in total

1.  Randomised controlled trial of genetic amniocentesis in 4606 low-risk women.

Authors:  A Tabor; J Philip; M Madsen; J Bang; E B Obel; B Nørgaard-Pedersen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-06-07       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Early amniocentesis and amniotic fluid AFP levels.

Authors:  B F Crandall; F W Hanson; F Tennant
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1987-11-14       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Safety of placental biopsy in the second and third trimesters.

Authors:  W Holzgreve; P Miny; S Basaran; W Fuhrmann; F K Beller
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1987-10-29       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Rapid karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.

Authors:  S Basaran; P Miny; I H Pawlowitzki; J Horst; W Holzgreve
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 3.050

5.  United States survey on chromosome mosaicism and pseudomosaicism in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  L Y Hsu; T E Perlis
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.050

6.  Outcome of cases of de novo structural rearrangements diagnosed at amniocentesis.

Authors:  D Warburton
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 3.050

7.  Low fetal loss rates after ultrasound-proved viability in early pregnancy.

Authors:  J L Simpson; J L Mills; L B Holmes; C L Ober; J Aarons; L Jovanovic; R H Knopp
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-11-13       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Early amniocentesis for prenatal cytogenetic evaluation.

Authors:  B R Benacerraf; M F Greene; D H Saltzman; V A Barss; C A Penso; A S Nadel; L J Heffner; J M Stryker; M M Sandstrom; F D Frigoletto
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Cytogenetic results from the U.S. Collaborative Study on CVS.

Authors:  D H Ledbetter; J M Zachary; J L Simpson; M S Golbus; E Pergament; L Jackson; M J Mahoney; R J Desnick; J Schulman; K L Copeland
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 3.050

10.  Genetic amniocentesis in twin gestations.

Authors:  S Elias; A B Gerbie; J L Simpson; H L Nadler; R E Sabbagha; A Shkolnik
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-09-15       Impact factor: 8.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.