Literature DB >> 8235866

The symptomatic lumbar disc in patients with low-back pain. Magnetic resonance imaging appearances in both a symptomatic and control population.

G Buirski1, M Silberstein.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging of abnormal lumbar discs in 115 symptomatic patients (184 discs) and 63 symptom-free controls (78 discs) have been compared. All symptomatic patients were proven to have discogenic pain at discography. Discs were classified into patterns 1-6 reflecting the progressive changes of nuclear degeneration as previously described. In the symptomatic patient, the more degenerate the disc the more likely it was responsible for pain (P < 0.001), but there was no statistically significant difference in the distribution of abnormal signal patterns between the two groups studied. A small number of patients in both populations demonstrated high signal from disc protrusions but this also could not be used as a predictor of pain. No abnormal lumbar disc signal pattern could be identified that specifically indicated whether a disc would be painful. Magnetic resonance imaging is accurate in determining nuclear anatomy, but until more suitable techniques become available, discography is still the only method for symptomatic assessment in low-back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8235866     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199310000-00016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  19 in total

Review 1.  [Feasibilities and bounds of diagnostic radiology in case of back pain].

Authors:  W Pennekamp; G Rduch; V Nicolas
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.107

Review 2.  The relevance of high-intensity zones in degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  Jason Pui Yin Cheung; Keith Dip Kei Luk
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  Clinical efficacy of imaging modalities in the diagnosis of low-back pain disorders.

Authors:  N Boos; P H Lander
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The influence of preoperative MRI findings on lumbar fusion clinical outcomes.

Authors:  Mladen Djurasovic; Leah Y Carreon; Charles H Crawford; Jason D Zook; Kelly R Bratcher; Steven D Glassman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-03       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Diagnostic relevance of pressure-controlled discography.

Authors:  Dong-Ah Shin; Hyoung-Ihl Kim; Jae-Hyun Jung; Dong-Gyu Shin; Jung-Ok Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Prevalence of disc degeneration in asymptomatic korean subjects. Part 1 : lumbar spine.

Authors:  Sang Jin Kim; Tae Hoon Lee; Soo Mee Lim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2013-01-31

7.  'Progressive-onset' versus injury-associated discogenic low back pain: features of disc internal derangement in patients studied with provocation lumbar discography.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; L M Dejohn; W E Rothfus; P C Gerszten
Journal:  Interv Neuroradiol       Date:  2013-03-04       Impact factor: 1.610

Review 8.  [Diagnostics and minimally invasive therapy for chronic low back pain].

Authors:  M A Rauschmann; J Warzecha; M Arabmotlagh; A Mayer; D V Stechow
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Assessment of intervertebral disc degeneration with magnetic resonance single-voxel spectroscopy.

Authors:  Jin Zuo; Ehsan Saadat; Adan Romero; Kimberly Loo; Xiaojuan Li; Thomas M Link; John Kurhanewicz; Sharmila Majumdar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.668

10.  Intradiscal methylene blue injection for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain.

Authors:  Baogan Peng; Yingmin Zhang; Shuxun Hou; Wenwen Wu; Xiaobing Fu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.