Literature DB >> 8235851

Longitudinal element size effect on load sharing, internal loads, and fatigue life of tri-level spinal implant constructs.

R C Duffield1, W L Carson, L Y Chen, B Voth.   

Abstract

The effects of implant stiffness on load sharing and stress shielding, of vertebral column load sharing on implant fatigue life, and of instrumenting two versus one level adjacent to a comminuted segment on implant internal loads were studied. Finite element models of six screw constructs with 4.76 mm rod; 6.35 mm rod, and VSP plate tri-level instrumentation of two motion segments (healthy vertebra case and comminuted) and an adjacent healthy motion segment with dimensions representative of the human lumbar spine were used. Also a simplified model was developed to predict the percent of axial load passing through the column, which is a function of ki/kv the ratio of implant axial stiffness to instrumented vertebral column axial stiffness. For constructs with dimensions typical of the human lumbar spine, 77 to 80% of the axial load was predicted to pass through one or two healthy motion segments when instrumented with either 6.35 mm rod or VSP plates, compared to 90% when instrumented with 4.76 mm rods. When instrumenting smaller motion segments (in dogs) for comparison, 60% of the axial load was predicted to pass through the column for 4.76 mm rod and 33% for 6.35 mm rod constructs due to increased implant stiffness ki as a result of decreased AP and longitudinal construct dimensions, and lower canine motion segment stiffness kv.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8235851     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199309000-00019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Perioperative complications with rhBMP-2 in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.

Authors:  Kirk Owens; Steven D Glassman; Jennifer M Howard; Mladen Djurasovic; Jonathan L Witten; Leah Y Carreon
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Evaluation of indication-based use of transpedicular instrumentations with different rigidity for lumbar spinal fusion: a prospective pilot study with 3 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Michael Pfeiffer; Ralph Hildebrand; Michael Grande; Peter Griss
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Biomechanical evaluation of pedicle screw-based dynamic stabilization devices for the lumbar spine: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cédric Y Barrey; Ravi K Ponnappan; Jason Song; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  SAS J       Date:  2008-12-01

4.  Mini-open anterior spine surgery for anterior lumbar diseases.

Authors:  Ruey-Mo Lin; Kuo-Yuan Huang; Kuo-An Lai
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-03-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Finite Element Analysis and Biomechanical Comparison of Short Posterior Spinal Instrumentation with Divergent Bridge Construct versus Parallel Tension Band Construct for Thoracolumbar Spine Fractures.

Authors:  Jean A Ouellet; Corey Richards; Zeeshan M Sardar; Demetri Giannitsios; Nicholas Noiseux; Willem S Strydom; Rudy Reindl; Peter Jarzem; Vincent Arlet; Thomas Steffen
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2013-05-23

6.  Pedicle-Screw-Based Dynamic Systems and Degenerative Lumbar Diseases: Biomechanical and Clinical Experiences of Dynamic Fusion with Isobar TTL.

Authors:  Cédric Barrey; Gilles Perrin; Sabina Champain
Journal:  ISRN Orthop       Date:  2013-01-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.