Literature DB >> 8235847

The use of primary internal fixation in spondylolisthesis.

R A McGuire1, G M Amundson.   

Abstract

A prospective randomized study was designed to examine differences in the primary fusion rate between two surgically treated groups of patients with spondylolisthesis. Twenty-seven patients underwent L5 laminectomy (Gill procedure) and L5 nerve root decompression. Fourteen patients (group I) underwent in-situ posterolateral fusion, thirteen patients (group II) received internal stabilization with the Steffee plate and screw system. All patients were followed for a minimum of two years. Ten of fourteen (72%) patients treated with non-instrumented fusion went on to union. Ten of thirteen (78%) patients treated with internal fixation achieved union. No statistically significant increase in the primary fusion rate occurred with addition of internal fixation compared to non-instrumented posterolateral grafting alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8235847     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199309000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  20 in total

Review 1.  Fusion for low-grade adult isthmic spondylolisthesis: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Wilco C H Jacobs; Arnold Vreeling; Marinus De Kleuver
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Outcome of invasive treatment modalities on back pain and sciatica: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Maurits W van Tulder; Bart Koes; Seppo Seitsalo; Antti Malmivaara
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  In situ instrumented posterolateral fusion without decompression in symptomatic low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in adults.

Authors:  Mohammed Farooq Butt; Shabir Ahmed Dhar; Imtiyaz Hakeem; Munir Farooq; Manzoor Ahmed Halwai; Mohammad Ramzan Mir; Khursheed Ahmed Kangu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  An update on bone substitutes for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Masashi Miyazaki; Hiroshi Tsumura; Jeffrey C Wang; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Early complications of spinal pedicle screw.

Authors:  A A Faraj; J K Webb
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  A Narrative Review of Lumbar Fusion Surgery With Relevance to Chiropractic Practice.

Authors:  Clinton J Daniels; Pamela J Wakefield; Glenn A Bub; James D Toombs
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2016-10-18

7.  Efficacy of platelet-rich plasma in posterior lumbar interbody fusion: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Saran Pairuchvej; Janisa Andrea Muljadi; Alisara Arirachakaran; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2019-12-20

8.  Bone mineral density changes after ovariectomy in rats as an osteopenic model : stepwise description of double dorso-lateral approach.

Authors:  Sung Bae Park; Yoon Jin Lee; Chun Kee Chung
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-10-30

9.  Ex vivo transfer of the Hoxc-8-interacting domain of Smad1 by a tropism-modified adenoviral vector results in efficient bone formation in a rabbit model of spinal fusion.

Authors:  Joanne T Douglas; Angel A Rivera; Gray R Lyons; Patricia F Lott; Dezhi Wang; Majd Zayzafoon; Gene P Siegal; Xu Cao; Steven M Theiss
Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech       Date:  2010-02

10.  Clinical efficacy of pedicle instrumentation and posterolateral fusion in the symptomatic degenerative lumbar spine.

Authors:  J D Rompe; P Eysel; C Hopf
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.