Literature DB >> 8235837

Are there indications for partial rib resection in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation?

C J Harvey1, R R Betz, D H Clements, G K Huss, M Clancy.   

Abstract

In adolescent idiopathic scoliosis the cosmetically unacceptable rib prominence is one of the main reasons patients seek treatment. Ninety-eight patients were reviewed with Cotrel-Dubousset (CD) instrumentation (average follow-up, 27 months; average preoperative curve, 53 degrees) and 27 patients with Harrington instrumentation and rib resection (average follow-up, 43 months; average preoperative curve, 52 degrees). Of the 98 patients who had CD instrumentation, 15 underwent concomitant rib resection. Of the 83 patients without rib resection, 71 (72%) were rated satisfactory and 12 unsatisfactory by cosmetic criteria based on residual rib deformity. These results were compared to those of 27 patients receiving Harrington rod instrumentation and rib resection, of whom 23 (85%) were rated as satisfactory. All 15 patients with CD and rib resection were rated satisfactory. The CD patients were then redivided into two groups (rib resection indicated or rib resection not indicated) as follows: the 12 unsatisfactory CD patients without rib resection (in whom a rib resection should have been done) were grouped with the 15 CD patients who underwent rib resection, for a total of 27 rib resections indicated, or 28%. This group was compared to the 71 satisfactory CD patients without rib resection (rib resection not indicated). Patients with a rib prominence of > 15 degrees preoperatively had or should have had a rib resection. Patients with a higher chance of needing rib resection included those with a curve severity greater than 60 degrees, curve flexibility less than 20%, a preoperative rib prominence > 10 degrees, or intraoperative curve correction of less than 50%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8235837     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199309000-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  6 in total

1.  Loss of apical vertebral derotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: 2-year follow-up using multi-planar reconstruction computed tomography.

Authors:  Guanyu Cui; Kota Watanabe; Yuji Nishiwaki; Naobumi Hosogane; Takashi Tsuji; Ken Ishii; Masaya Nakamura; Yoshiaki Toyama; Kazuhiro Chiba; Morio Matsumoto
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-23       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Primary thoracoplasty and pedicle screw instrumentation in thoracic idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Kan Min; Beat Waelchli; Frederik Hahn
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-08-11       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Do vertebral derotation techniques offer better outcomes compared to traditional methods in the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

Authors:  Paul R P Rushton; Michael P Grevitt
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Apical vertebral derotation in the posterior treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: myth or reality?

Authors:  Mario Di Silvestre; Francesco Lolli; Georgios Bakaloudis; Elena Maredi; Francesco Vommaro; Francesca Pastorelli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Management of severe and rigid idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Luis Eduardo Carelli Teixeira da Silva; Alderico Girão Campos de Barros; Gustavo Borges Laurindo de Azevedo
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-06-02

6.  Can Breast Asymmetry Following the Treatment of Juvenile Idiopathic Scoliosis with Growing Rod Be Prevented? : A Preliminary Analysis.

Authors:  Yunus Atici; Barış Polat; Sinan Erdogan; Tahsin Gürpınar; Serdar Demiröz
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2020-02-07
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.