Literature DB >> 8235819

Decompression for degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis at L4-5. The effects on facet joint morphology.

L J Grobler1, P A Robertson, J E Novotny, J W Ahern.   

Abstract

Anatomic variations exist in the facet joint orientation, shape, and size at L4-5. This morphology is further modified by degenerative changes in spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. This study explored the morphologic alteration of "pedicle-to-pedicle" decompression on the facet joints in normal patients, spinal stenosis patients, and degenerative spondylolisthesis patients. Using computerized digitization, computed tomographic scan images of the facet joint at L4-5 and the medial border of the pedicle at L5 were superimposed. The facet joint orientation, coronal dimension, percentage, and absolute reduction in coronal dimension after pedicle-to-pedicle decompression, and residual coronal dimension after decompression at L4-5 were measured for the three groups. There is a significantly reduced coronal dimension of the facet joint in degenerative spondylolisthesis patients compared with spinal stenosis and normal patients (P < 0.01). The average reduction of the facet joint coronal dimension is 34% (SD 30%) in degenerative spondylolisthesis, and 36% (SD 25%) in spinal stenosis. The smaller preoperative coronal dimension in degenerative spondylolisthesis leads to a significantly reduced residual coronal dimension in degenerative spondylolisthesis compared with normal patients (5.9 mm [SD 4.3 mm] vs. 9.3 mm [SD 3.5 mm]), respectively. Wide variations in facet joint reduction and residual facet joint coronal dimension exist. The significantly reduced coronal dimension after decompression in degenerative spondylolisthesis may be correlated to a trend to further anterior displacement if it is treated with decompression alone. Case-specific assessment of residual facet joint morphology after decompression in both spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis patients should be integrated into decisions about fusion for stability at the L4-5 level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8235819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  4 in total

Review 1.  L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis: indications and technique for operative management.

Authors:  M R O'Rourke; L J Grobler
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  1998

2.  Clinical and Radiological Outcomes after Microscopic Bilateral Decompression via a Unilateral Approach for Degenerative Lumbar Disease: Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up.

Authors:  Sho Dohzono; Hiromitsu Toyoda; Akira Matsumura; Hidetomi Terai; Akinobu Suzuki; Hiroaki Nakamura
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-04-12

3.  Decompression with fusion is not in superiority to decompression alone in lumbar stenosis based on randomized controlled trials: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis.

Authors:  Shuai Xu; Jinyu Wang; Yan Liang; Zhenqi Zhu; Kaifeng Wang; Yalong Qian; Haiying Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

4.  Microendoscopic discectomy versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spinal stenosis without spondylolisthesis.

Authors:  Weihong Yi; Yu Tang; Dazhi Yang; Wenhua Huang; Huan Liu; Ziqi Sun; Yuan Yao; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.