Literature DB >> 8234291

26-10 Fab-digoxin complex: affinity and specificity due to surface complementarity.

P D Jeffrey1, R K Strong, L C Sieker, C Y Chang, R L Campbell, G A Petsko, E Haber, M N Margolies, S Sheriff.   

Abstract

We have determined the three-dimensional structures of the antigen-binding fragment of the anti-digoxin monoclonal antibody 26-10 in the uncomplexed state at 2.7 A resolution and as a complex with digoxin at 2.5 A resolution. Neither the antibody nor digoxin undergoes any significant conformational changes upon forming the complex. Digoxin interacts primarily with the antibody heavy chain and is oriented such that the carbohydrate groups are exposed to solvent and the lactone ring is buried in a deep pocket at the bottom of the combining site. Despite extensive interactions between antibody and antigen, no hydrogen bonds or salt links are formed between 26-10 and digoxin. Thus the 26-10-digoxin complex is unique among the known three-dimensional structures of antibody-antigen complexes in that specificity and high affinity arise primarily from shape complementarity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8234291      PMCID: PMC47764          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10310

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  13 in total

1.  Reversal of advanced digoxin intoxication with Fab fragments of digoxin-specific antibodies.

Authors:  T W Smith; E Haber; L Yeatman; V P Butler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1976-04-08       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures.

Authors:  F C Bernstein; T F Koetzle; G J Williams; E F Meyer; M D Brice; J R Rodgers; O Kennard; T Shimanouchi; M Tasumi
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1977-05-25       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 3.  Digitalis. Mechanisms of action and clinical use.

Authors:  T W Smith
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1988-02-11       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Structure of myohemerythrin in the azidomet state at 1.7/1.3 A resolution.

Authors:  S Sheriff; W A Hendrickson; J L Smith
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1987-09-20       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Modulation of antibody affinity by a non-contact residue.

Authors:  J F Schillbach; R I Near; R E Bruccoleri; E Haber; P D Jeffrey; J Novotny; S Sheriff; M N Margolies
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  High-affinity monoclonal antibodies to the cardiac glycoside, digoxin.

Authors:  M M Hunter; M N Margolies; A Ju; E Haber
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 5.422

7.  Crystallization of the Fab fragment of a monoclonal anti-digoxin antibody and its complex with digoxin.

Authors:  D R Rose; B A Seaton; G A Petsko; J Novotný; M N Margolies; E Locke; E Haber
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-03-25       Impact factor: 5.469

8.  Side-chain torsional potentials: effect of dipeptide, protein, and solvent environment.

Authors:  B R Gelin; M Karplus
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1979-04-03       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Crystals of phosphorylcholine-binding Fab-fragments from mouse myeloma proteins: preparation and x-ray analysis.

Authors:  S Rudikoff; M Potter; D M Segal; E A Padlan; D R Davies
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Binding and structural diversity among high-affinity monoclonal anti-digoxin antibodies.

Authors:  M Mudgett-Hunter; W Anderson; E Haber; M N Margolies
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 4.407

View more
  21 in total

1.  Quantitative analysis of the effect of the mutation frequency on the affinity maturation of single chain Fv antibodies.

Authors:  P S Daugherty; G Chen; B L Iverson; G Georgiou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-02-29       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Steroid binding by antibodies and artificial receptors: exploration of theoretical methods to determine the origins of binding affinities and specificities.

Authors:  S Handschuh; B Goldfuss; J Chen; J Gasteiger; K N Houk
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  On the calculation of absolute macromolecular binding free energies.

Authors:  Hengbin Luo; Kim Sharp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Steered molecular dynamics simulations of ligand-receptor interaction in lipocalins.

Authors:  Janne Kalikka; Jaakko Akola
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-13       Impact factor: 1.733

5.  Computational biology: A recipe for ligand-binding proteins.

Authors:  Giovanna Ghirlanda
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-09-04       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Symmetry of Fv architecture is conducive to grafting a second antibody binding site in the Fv region.

Authors:  P C Keck; J S Huston
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Comparative docking studies on ligand binding to the multispecific antibodies IgE-La2 and IgE-Lb4.

Authors:  C A Sotriffer; R H Winger; K R Liedl; B M Rode; J M Varga
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.686

8.  In vitro scanning saturation mutagenesis of an antibody binding pocket.

Authors:  E A Burks; G Chen; G Georgiou; B L Iverson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Synthetic antibody libraries focused towards peptide ligands.

Authors:  Christian W Cobaugh; Juan C Almagro; Mark Pogson; Brent Iverson; George Georgiou
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Modifying specificity of antidigoxin antibodies using insertional mutagenesis.

Authors:  Rustem A Krykbaev; Panayota Tsantili; Philip D Jeffrey; Michael N Margolies
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.