Literature DB >> 8234270

Blastocyst's state of activity determines the "window" of implantation in the receptive mouse uterus.

B C Paria1, Y M Huet-Hudson, S K Dey.   

Abstract

The present investigation studied the influence of the blastocyst's state of activity on the "window" of implantation in the receptive uterus in the mouse. The receptive state of the uterus is defined as the limited time when the uterine milieu is favorable to blastocyst acceptance and implantation. In the mouse, implantation occurs on day 4 (day 1 = vaginal plug). Ovariectomy in the morning of day 4 prior to preimplantation estrogen secretion results in blastocyst dormancy and delayed implantation. These conditions are maintained by continued progesterone (P4) treatment but can be terminated with an injection of estrogen leading to blastocyst activation and subsequent implantation. Blastocyst transfers into intact pseudopregnant mice demonstrated that the window of implantation on day 4 remains open at least through 1800 h for normal day 4 blastocysts but only up to 1400 h for dormant blastocysts. These results suggested that the blastocyst's state of activity influenced the normally operative window of implantation in the receptive uterus. This finding was further confirmed by inducing conditions of delayed implantation in pregnant donors and pseudopregnant recipients. They were ovariectomized on the morning of day 4 and maintained with daily injections of P4 from days 5 to 7. On day 7, dormant blastocysts from P4-treated delayed donors were transferred into the uteri of P4-treated delayed pseudopregnant recipients at 1, 2, 4, or 8 h after an injection of 17 beta-estradiol (E2). Dormant blastocysts transferred into delayed recipients at 1 h after E2 treatment resulted in implantation in most of the animals as compared to complete failure of blastocysts to implant after transfer to P4-treated delayed recipients at 4 or 8 h after E2 treatment. However, implantation did occur in P4-treated delayed recipients at these later hours of E2 treatment when the P4-treated delayed donors also received E2 prior to blastocyst transfer. Furthermore, the majority of day 4 normal blastocysts implanted when transferred into P4-treated delayed recipients even at 16 h after E2 treatment. Interestingly, day 7 dormant blastocysts cultured for 8 or 24 h for in vitro activation failed to implant after transfer to P4-treated delayed pseudopregnant recipients at 4 ir 8 h after E2 treatment, although they did implant after transfer at 1 h after E2 treatment. As expected, normal day 4 blastocysts failed to implant after transfer to P4-treated delayed pseudopregnant recipients. Thus, these results establish that the blastocyst's state of activity alters the timing of implantation (window) in the receptive uterus. Thus, the window for successful implantation could be defined as a limited time span when the activated stage of the blastocyst is superimposed on the receptive state of the uterus. This window remains open for a shorter period for dormant blastocysts than for a normal or dormant blastocysts after E2 activation. Furthermore, dormant blastocysts, which apparently achieved metabolic activation in vitro, failed to attain the same status as blastocysts activated in utero by E2 for implantation into the receptive uterus. A key finding of this investigation is that E2 induces very rapidly, but transiently (1 h), a factor(s) in the P4-primed uterus that activates the dormant blastocysts for implantation in the receptive uterus.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8234270      PMCID: PMC47733          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.21.10159

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  11 in total

1.  Production of carbon dioxide in vitro by blastocysts from intact and ovariectomized mice.

Authors:  C A Torbit; H M Weitlauf
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1975-01

Review 2.  Metabolic changes in the blastocysts of mice and rats during delayed implantation.

Authors:  H M Weitlauf
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1974-07

3.  Modified ependymal cells in the ventral hypothalamus of the rhesus monkey and their possible role in the hypothalamic regulation of anterior pituitary function.

Authors:  T C Kumar
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  1968-08       Impact factor: 4.286

Review 4.  Uterine receptivity for nidation.

Authors:  A Psychoyos
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Role of early and late oestrogenic effects on implantation in the mouse.

Authors:  Y M Huet; S K Dey
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1987-11

6.  Delayed implantation in the spayed, progesterone treated adult mouse.

Authors:  K Yoshinaga; C E Adams
Journal:  J Reprod Fertil       Date:  1966-12

7.  Preimplantation embryo development in vitro: cooperative interactions among embryos and role of growth factors.

Authors:  B C Paria; S K Dey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Expression of estrogen receptor gene in mouse oocyte and during embryogenesis.

Authors:  T C Wu; L Wang; Y J Wan
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 2.609

9.  Requirement for progesterone priming and its long-term effects on implantation in the mouse.

Authors:  Y M Huet-Hudson; S K Dey
Journal:  Proc Soc Exp Biol Med       Date:  1990-04

10.  Expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene is regulated in mouse blastocysts during delayed implantation.

Authors:  B C Paria; S K Das; G K Andrews; S K Dey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-01-01       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  130 in total

1.  Estrogen is a critical determinant that specifies the duration of the window of uterine receptivity for implantation.

Authors:  Wen-ge Ma; Haengseok Song; Sanjoy K Das; Bibhash C Paria; Sudhansu K Dey
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-02-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Expression of maspin in the early pregnant mouse endometrium and its role during embryonic implantation.

Authors:  Yan Huang; Lu-Wei Cai; Rong Yang
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  The Primacy of Maternal Innovations to the Evolution of Embryo Implantation.

Authors:  Daniel J Stadtmauer; Günter P Wagner
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  Heparin-binding epidermal growth factor (HB-EGF) may improve embryonic development and implantation by increasing vitronectin receptor (integrin alphanubeta3) expression in peri-implantation mouse embryos.

Authors:  Jung Jin Lim; Dong Ryul Lee; Haeng-Seok Song; Kye-Seong Kim; Tae Ki Yoon; Myung Chan Gye; Moon Kyoo Kim
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2006-04-19       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 5.  Global gene expression profiling of preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Toshio Hamatani; Minoru Sh Ko; Mitsutoshi Yamada; Naoaki Kuji; Yuri Mizusawa; Mayumi Shoji; Tomonori Hada; Hironori Asada; Tetsuo Maruyama; Yasunori Yoshimura
Journal:  Hum Cell       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 4.174

6.  Differential regulation of endocannabinoid synthesis and degradation in the uterus during embryo implantation.

Authors:  Haibin Wang; Huirong Xie; Xiaofei Sun; Philip J Kingsley; Lawrence J Marnett; Benjamin F Cravatt; Sudhansu K Dey
Journal:  Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.072

7.  FKBP52 deficiency-conferred uterine progesterone resistance is genetic background and pregnancy stage specific.

Authors:  Susanne Tranguch; Haibin Wang; Takiko Daikoku; Huirong Xie; David F Smith; Sudhansu K Dey
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 8.  Mechanisms of implantation: strategies for successful pregnancy.

Authors:  Jeeyeon Cha; Xiaofei Sun; Sudhansu K Dey
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 53.440

9.  ERBB receptor feedback inhibitor 1 regulation of estrogen receptor activity is critical for uterine implantation in mice.

Authors:  Tae Hoon Kim; Dong-Kee Lee; Heather L Franco; John P Lydon; Jae-Wook Jeong
Journal:  Biol Reprod       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 4.285

10.  Ovarian LGR5 is critical for successful pregnancy.

Authors:  Xiaofei Sun; Jumpei Terakawa; Hans Clevers; Nick Barker; Takiko Daikoku; Sudhansu K Dey
Journal:  FASEB J       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.