Literature DB >> 8233990

Project USAP the use of sedative agents in pediatric dentistry: 1991 update.

M Houpt1.   

Abstract

A national survey of members of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry was conducted to update information on the use of sedative agents by pediatric dentists. All 2532 members of the Academy were sent questionnaires regarding their use of sedation and 1497 responded. Practitioners were questioned regarding how frequently they used sedative agents and the nature of patients receiving sedation. In addition, they were questioned on reasons for change, if any, in their use of sedation during the past two years. A separate survey was conducted of directors of all 55 postdoctoral training programs in pediatric dentistry. Forty-six directors responded to questions concerning the type and frequency of sedation use in their programs. Both surveys demonstrated wide differences in sedation use between different training programs and between different practitioners. The heavier use of sedation by some practitioners or by some training programs, as compared with others, generally was not related to the percentage of handicapped patients who received sedation, nor to the type of training. Frequent users of sedation (more than once each day) were located more in the south/southeastern and western parts of the country and they tended to have been in specialty practice for more than 10 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8233990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 0164-1263            Impact factor:   1.874


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of oral chloral hydrate with intramuscular ketamine, meperidine, and promethazine for pediatric sedation--preliminary report.

Authors:  R L Campbell; G A Ross; J R Campbell; A P Mourino
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1998

2.  A prospective study of 2 sedation regimens in children: chloral hydrate, meperidine, and hydroxyzine versus midazolam, meperidine, and hydroxyzine.

Authors:  Marianne M Sheroan; Diane C Dilley; Warner J Lucas; William F Vann
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2006

3.  Bispectral index monitoring of sedation depth in pediatric dental patients.

Authors:  Christel M Haberland; Suher Baker; Haibei Liu
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2011

4.  Parental acceptance of behaviour-management techniques used in paediatric dentistry and its relation to parental dental anxiety and experience.

Authors:  V Boka; K Arapostathis; N Vretos; N Kotsanos
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2014-03-28

5.  Acceptance by Spanish parents of behaviour-management techniques used in paediatric dentistry.

Authors:  J Luis de León; F Guinot Jimeno; L J Bellet Dalmau
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2010-08

6.  A pilot study of the efficacy of oral midazolam for sedation in pediatric dental patients.

Authors:  D A Haas; S A Nenniger; R Yacobi; J G Magathan; H A Grad; P E Copp; M D Charendoff
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  1996

7.  A double-blind randomized controlled trial to compare the safety and efficacy of dexmedetomidine alone and in combination with ketamine in uncooperative and anxious paediatric dental patients requiring pulpectomy.

Authors:  K Haider; N Mittal; B Srivastava; N Gupta
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2022-04-05

8.  Acceptability and Efficacy of Commercial Oral Preparation of Midazolam for brief Painful Procedure: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Binita Srivastava; Neeti Mittal; Parteek Mittal
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2015-02-09

9.  A survey of pediatric dentists' caries-related treatment decisions and restorative modalities - A web-based survey.

Authors:  Hassan S Halawany; Fouad Salama; Vimal Jacob; Nimmi Biju Abraham; Tarfa Nasser Bin Moharib; Abdulfatah Samih Alazmah; Jawaher Abdulaziz Al Harbi
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2017-04-19
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.