Literature DB >> 8233297

Results of a Southwest Oncology Group phase III trial of carboplatin plus cyclophosphamide versus cisplatin plus cyclophosphamide in advanced ovarian cancer.

E V Hannigan1, S Green, D S Alberts, R O'Toole, E Surwit.   

Abstract

Cisplatin combined with cyclophosphamide has been considered a very active treatment for advanced ovarian cancer. Unfortunately, cisplatin is associated with dose-limiting neurotoxicity, as well as possible neuropathy, ototoxicity, and occasional renal dysfunction. Carboplatin, a cisplatin analogue, is active against advanced ovarian cancer, with a presumed lower incidence of emesis, ototoxicity, neuropathy, and renal dysfunction. The Southwest Oncology Group initiated a phase III randomized trial, in which 342 patients with stage III (suboptimal disease) and stage IV ovarian cancer were randomly assigned to treatment with six courses of intravenous cisplatin 100 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 or carboplatin 300 mg/m2 plus cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2. The median survival for the cisplatin arm was 17.4 months; for the carboplatin arm, median survival was 20.0 months. The null hypothesis of a 30% survival superiority with the cisplatin arm was rejected at the p = 0.02 level. Clinical response rates were 52% for the cisplatin arm and 61% for the carboplatin arm. There was less thrombocytopenia in the cisplatin arm (p < 0.001); however, there was less nausea and emesis (p < 0.001 for courses one to five), renal toxicity (p < 0.001), anemia (p < 0.001), hearing loss (p < 0.001), and neuromuscular toxicity (p < 0.001) in the carboplatin arm. Carboplatin/cyclophosphamide proved to have a significantly better therapeutic index than cisplatin/cyclophosphamide in these patients with advanced ovarian cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8233297     DOI: 10.1159/000227253

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncology        ISSN: 0030-2414            Impact factor:   2.935


  5 in total

1.  Carboplatin-Complexed and cRGD-Conjugated Unimolecular Nanoparticles for Targeted Ovarian Cancer Therapy.

Authors:  Yuyuan Wang; Liwei Wang; Guojun Chen; Shaoqin Gong
Journal:  Macromol Biosci       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 4.979

2.  Efficacy benefit of an NK1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA) in patients receiving carboplatin: supportive evidence with NEPA (a fixed combination of the NK1 RA, netupitant, and palonosetron) and aprepitant regimens.

Authors:  Karin Jordan; Richard Gralla; Giada Rizzi; Kimia Kashef
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 3.  Recent advances in brain tumor therapy: local intracerebral drug delivery by polymers.

Authors:  Christopher Guerin; Alessandro Olivi; Jon D Weingart; H Christopher Lawson; Henry Brem
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.850

4.  Guidelines versus individualized care for the management of CINV.

Authors:  Mark Clemons
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.603

5.  Bringing it all together in the treatment of CINV: application of current knowledge into routine clinical practice.

Authors:  David Warr
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-19       Impact factor: 3.603

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.