Literature DB >> 8233272

Pregnancy planning and pre-conception counseling. The PRAMS Working Group.

M M Adams1, F C Bruce, H B Shulman, J S Kendrick, D J Brogan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the percentage of women with one or more of four potentially modifiable risks who could have availed themselves of pre-conception counseling.
METHODS: We defined pre-conception counseling to be consultation that occurs shortly before a couple attempts conception. Thus, we assumed that to obtain pre-conception counseling, a woman must plan her pregnancy. We used data from a population-based survey of 12,452 new mothers in four states who delivered babies during 1988-1990. Mothers were contacted 3-6 months after delivery and asked about pre-conception behaviors and the planning status of their pregnancies. We estimated the percentage of women who planned their pregnancies and had an indication for pre-conception counseling related to smoking, drinking, being underweight, or delaying initiation of prenatal care.
RESULTS: State-specific response rates ranged from 68-84%. Sixty percent of mothers reported that their pregnancies were planned. In general, mothers with unintended pregnancies were more likely to have an indication for pre-conception counseling than mothers with planned pregnancies. Thirty-eight percent of all mothers planned their pregnancies and had one or more indications for pre-conception counseling. An additional 30% had one or more indications for counseling but did not have a planned pregnancy.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited range of indications for counseling that we considered, a substantial percentage of women potentially could have used counseling. A similar percentage of women could have benefited from family planning services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8233272

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  9 in total

1.  Socioeconomic and racial/ethnic disparities in unintended pregnancy among postpartum women in California.

Authors:  Catherine Cubbin; Paula A Braveman; Kristen S Marchi; Gilberto F Chavez; John S Santelli; Brenda J Colley Gilbert
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2002-12

2.  Exploring Preconception Care: Insurance Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Health in the Pre-pregnancy Period.

Authors:  Rebecca Mahn Hawks; Aileen P McGinn; Peter S Bernstein; Jonathan N Tobin
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2018-08

3.  Unintended pregnancy and breast-feeding behavior.

Authors:  T D Dye; M A Wojtowycz; R H Aubry; J Quade; H Kilburn
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Folic acid and the prevention of neural tube defects: A position paper of the national society of genetic counselors.

Authors:  B J Baty; L Cohen; L Phelps; M C Speer; P Stengel; L Williamson-Kruse
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Routine pre-pregnancy health promotion for improving pregnancy outcomes.

Authors:  Melissa Whitworth; Therese Dowswell
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2009-10-07

6.  Healthcare providers' views on the delivery of preconception care in a local community setting in the Netherlands.

Authors:  M Poels; M P H Koster; A Franx; H F van Stel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Informing the development and uptake of a weight management intervention for preconception: a mixed-methods investigation of patient and provider perceptions.

Authors:  Samantha M Harden; NithyaPriya S Ramalingam; Kathryn E Wilson; Emily Evans-Hoeker
Journal:  BMC Obes       Date:  2017-02-06

8.  Parental perspectives on the awareness and delivery of preconception care.

Authors:  M Poels; M P H Koster; A Franx; H F van Stel
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-09-26       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Prenatal, Perinatal and Neonatal Risk Factors for Intellectual Disability: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jichong Huang; Tingting Zhu; Yi Qu; Dezhi Mu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-25       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.