Literature DB >> 8232394

Sensitivity of three median-to-ulnar comparative tests in diagnosis of mild carpal tunnel syndrome.

A Uncini1, A Di Muzio, J Awad, G Manente, M Tafuro, D Gambi.   

Abstract

We studied 193 hands of 113 patients referred for typical carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Ninety-five (49%) hands had normal median distal motor latency (< or = 4.2 ms) and normal or borderline sensory conduction velocity from digit 2 stimulation (> or = 45 m/s). In these cases we performed three median to ulnar comparative tests: (1) difference between median and ulnar distal motor latencies recorded from the second lumbrical and interossei muscles (2L-INT); (2) difference between median and ulnar sensory latencies from digit 4 stimulation (D4M-D4U); and (3) difference between median and ulnar mixed nerve latencies from palmar stimulation (PM-PU). The 2L-INT difference was > or = 0.6 ms in 10% of hands. PM-PU and D4M-D4U were > or = 0.5 ms in 56% and 77% of hands, respectively. The greater sensitivity of D4M-D4U might be explained by the funicular topography and consequent greater susceptibility to compression of the cutaneous fibers from the third interspace which, at the distal carpal tunnel, are clumped superficially in the anteroulnar portion of the median nerve just beneath the transverse ligament.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8232394     DOI: 10.1002/mus.880161215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Muscle Nerve        ISSN: 0148-639X            Impact factor:   3.217


  17 in total

1.  Pitfalls in using the ring finger test alone for the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  L Capone; R Pentore; C Lunazzi; R Schönhuber
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-12

2.  Natural history of carpal tunnel syndrome according to the neurophysiological classification.

Authors:  L Padua; R Padua; M Lo Monaco; I Aprile; N Paciello; M Nazzaro; P Tonali
Journal:  Ital J Neurol Sci       Date:  1998-12

3.  A new method to define cutoff values in nerve conduction studies for carpal tunnel syndrome considering the presence of false-positive cases.

Authors:  Yosuke Miyaji; Masahito Kobayashi; Chizuko Oishi; Yoshikazu Mizoi; Fumiaki Tanaka; Masahiro Sonoo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2019-11-23       Impact factor: 3.307

Review 4.  Carpal tunnel syndrome: a review.

Authors:  F P Cantatore; F Dell'Accio; G Lapadula
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Subclinical impairment in the median nerve across the carpal tunnel among female VDT operators.

Authors:  K Murata; S Araki; F Okajima; Y Saito
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Role of Biomechanical Factors in Resolution of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Among a Population of Workers.

Authors:  Amilcar Cardona; Matthew S Thiese; Jay Kapellusch; Andrew Merryweather; Eric Wood; Kurt T Hegmann
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 2.162

7.  Comparison of sensory conduction techniques in the diagnosis of mild idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome: which finger, which test?

Authors:  Serpil Demirci; Birkan Sonel
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2003-07-16       Impact factor: 2.631

8.  Clinical surveillance of carpal tunnel syndrome in two areas of the United Kingdom, 1991-2001.

Authors:  J D P Bland; S M Rudolfer
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 10.154

9.  Lumbrical-interosseous recording technique versus routine electrodiagnostic methods in the diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Figen Yılmaz; Osman Hakan Gündüz; Gülseren Akyüz
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-08-17

10.  Sensitivities of conventional and new electrophysiological techniques in carpal tunnel syndrome and their relationship to body mass index.

Authors:  Recep Aygül; Hzir Ulvi; Dilcan Kotan; Mutlu Kuyucu; Recep Demir
Journal:  J Brachial Plex Peripher Nerve Inj       Date:  2009-07-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.