Literature DB >> 8230854

Maximal oxygen uptake and aerobic-anaerobic transition on treadmill and bicycle in triathletes.

J Medelli1, Y Maingourd, B Bouferrache, V Bach, M Freville, J P Libert.   

Abstract

The maximal aerobic capacity and the aerobic-anaerobic transition were analyzed on 14 triathletes performing an incremental work load on a bicycle ergometer and on horizontal or inclined treadmills. To compared the cardiorespiratory responses between cycling and running, the subjects were divided into 2 groups of 7 with similar aerobic capacity determined from cycle runs. The first group ran on horizontal treadmill while the second group performed similar exercise on inclined treadmill at constant grade (1.5%). Heart rate was recorded by electrocardiogram. Oxygen uptake (VO2), CO2 production (VCO2), respiratory frequency, and pulmonary ventilation were monitored at 30 s intervals through a Rudolph valve connected to a calibrated Oxycon V. Tidal volume, respiratory exchange ratio, equivalent O2 and CO2 were calculated from on-line computer. Aerobic and anaerobic thresholds were determined by a non-invasive method from pulmonary ventilation curves. The results showed that maximum oxygen uptake (VO2max) did not differ between the 2 types of ergometers. Pulmonary ventilation, heart rate and VO2 recorded at aerobic and anaerobic thresholds depended on the mode of exercise and reached the highest values on inclined treadmill. The amount of muscle mass, the type and the distribution of active motor units involved in each exercise test might be at the origin of these differences. This indicates that, when assessing a training program from anaerobic threshold values, it is necessary to take into consideration the type of ergometer used and the protocol performed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8230854     DOI: 10.2170/jjphysiol.43.347

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jpn J Physiol        ISSN: 0021-521X


  7 in total

1.  Treadmill and Cycle Ergometer Tests are Interchangeable to Monitor Triathletes Annual Training.

Authors:  Fabien A Basset; Marcel R Boulay
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Can We Draw General Conclusions from Interval Training Studies?

Authors:  Ricardo Borges Viana; Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira; João Pedro Araújo Naves; Victor Silveira Coswig; Fabrício Boscolo Del Vecchio; Rodrigo Ramirez-Campillo; Carlos Alexandre Vieira; Paulo Gentil
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Respiratory gas exchange indices for estimating the anaerobic threshold.

Authors:  Geir Solberg; Bjørn Robstad; Ole Henning Skjønsberg; Fredrik Borchsenius
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2005-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 4.  Physiological differences between cycling and running: lessons from triathletes.

Authors:  Gregoire P Millet; V E Vleck; D J Bentley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Low agreement of ventilatory threshold between training modes in cardiac patients.

Authors:  Dominique Hansen; Paul Dendale; Jan Berger; Romain Meeusen
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2007-08-01       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Reliability of the heart rate variability threshold during treadmill exercise.

Authors:  Trent A Hargens; Shane Chambers; Nicholas D Luden; Christopher J Womack
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2022-05-19       Impact factor: 2.121

7.  Differences between Treadmill and Cycle Ergometer Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing Results in Triathletes and Their Association with Body Composition and Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Szymon Price; Szczepan Wiecha; Igor Cieśliński; Daniel Śliż; Przemysław Seweryn Kasiak; Jacek Lach; Grzegorz Gruba; Tomasz Kowalski; Artur Mamcarz
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-03-17       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.