Literature DB >> 8230572

Percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty versus surgical reconstruction of atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: a prospective randomized study.

H Weibull1, D Bergqvist, S E Bergentz, K Jonsson, L Hulthén, P Manhem.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare percutaneous transluminal renal angioplasty (PTRA) and operation as initial therapy with regard to technical results, primary and secondary patency, and effects on blood pressure and renal function in patients with atherosclerotic unilateral renal artery stenosis.
METHODS: Fifty-eight patients who did not have diabetes, who were less than 70 years of age, and who had severe hypertension and significant stenosis were randomized to receive PTRA or operation. Angiography was performed 10 days, 1 year, and 2 years after treatment to verify patency, and blood pressure and renal function were simultaneously evaluated.
RESULTS: Technically, PTRA was successful in 83% and operation in 97% of patients. The primary patency rate after 24 months was 75% in the PTRA group and 96% in the operative group in technically successful cases. The secondary patency rate in the PTRA group was 90% and in the surgical group 97%. To achieve these results four patients in the PTRA group required operation, and one patient in the surgical group required PTRA. Hypertension was cured or improved after additional treatment in 90% of the patients after PTRA and 86% after operation. The corresponding figures for improved or unchanged renal function were 83% and 72%, respectively. After additional treatment, effects on blood pressure and renal function did not differ. Seventeen percent of the patients treated with PTRA required surgical intervention.
CONCLUSIONS: PTRA is recommended as first choice of therapy for atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis causing renovascular hypertension if combined with intensive follow-up and aggressive reintervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8230572     DOI: 10.1067/mva.1993.45062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  31 in total

Review 1.  Arteriosclerotic renal artery stenosis: conservative versus interventional management.

Authors:  Christlieb Haller
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  [Treatment of renal artery stenosis in the year 2021].

Authors:  Tomas Lenz
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2021-01-18       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Renal artery revascularization after unsuccessful percutaneous therapy: a single centre experience.

Authors:  Kai M Balzer; S Neuschäfer; T A Sagban; D Grotemeyer; T Pfeiffer; L C Rump; W Sandmann
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-10-18       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Management of atherosclerotic renovascular disease: the effect of renal artery stenting on renal function and blood pressure.

Authors:  Kosmas I Paraskevas; Despina Perrea; Despina D Briana; Christos D Liapis
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Response of blood pressure after percutaneous transluminal renal artery angioplasty and stenting.

Authors:  Jayesh S Prajapati; Sharad R Jain; Hasit Joshi; Shaurin Shah; Kamal Sharma; Sibasis Sahoo; Kapil Virparia; Ashok Thakkar
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2013-07-26

Review 6.  Atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis: surgery, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, or medical therapy?

Authors:  P F Plouin; B Guéry; A La Batide Alanore
Journal:  Curr Hypertens Rep       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 5.369

7.  Setting up a medical clinical office.

Authors:  Timothy P Murphy; Gregory M Soares
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.513

8.  Marketing the interventional clinical practice to the referring community and to patients.

Authors:  Timothy P Murphy; Gregory M Soares
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 9.  [Current management of renal artery stenosis].

Authors:  T Lenz
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 10.  Clinical practice. Renal-artery stenosis.

Authors:  Lance D Dworkin; Christopher J Cooper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.