Literature DB >> 8230517

Mitomycin C versus estramustine in the treatment of hormone resistant metastatic prostate cancer: the final analysis of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, genitourinary group prospective randomized phase III study (30865).

D W Newling1, S D Fossa, U W Tunn, K H Kurth, M de Pauw, R Sylvester.   

Abstract

A total of 171 patients with progressive metastatic prostate cancer following hormonal therapy was randomized to receive either 560 to 700 mg. estramustine orally per day or 15 mg./m.2 mitomycin C by intravenous infusion every 6 weeks. The patients were recruited during a 2.5-year period, and 70% had undergone more than 1 previous therapy for prostate cancer, with some having received as many as 5 different previous treatments. The overall results were disappointing. The median time to progression was 5 months and 50% of the patients died within 10 months. There was no difference in efficacy between the 2 treatment arms. Toxicity was severe in both arms but appeared earlier in those patients receiving estramustine, leading to a tendency for earlier deterioration in performance status. In this group of heavily pretreated patients there appears to be no justification for the use of either of these agents at the present time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8230517     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)35911-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  6 in total

1.  Efficacy of estramustine phosphate sodium hydrate (EMP) monotherapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer patients: report of 102 cases and review of literature.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Matsumoto; Nobuyuki Tanaka; Nozomi Hayakawa; Taisuke Ezaki; Kenjiro Suzuki; Takahiro Maeda; Akiharu Ninomiya; So Nakamura
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2013-09-05       Impact factor: 3.064

2.  Efficacy of estramustine phosphate according to risk classification of castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Akinori Minato; Naohiro Fujimoto; Tatsuhiko Kubo; Shuji Harada; Soichiro Akasaka; Tetsuro Matsumoto
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.064

Review 3.  Second-line treatment of metastatic prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  D W Newling
Journal:  Urol Res       Date:  1997

Review 4.  Non-hormonal systemic therapy in men with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and metastases: a systematic review from the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-based Care's Genitourinary Cancer Disease Site Group.

Authors:  Eric Winquist; Tricia Waldron; Scott Berry; D Scott Ernst; Sébastien Hotte; Himu Lukka
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 4.430

5.  Epirubicin combined with estramustine phosphate in hormone-resistant prostate cancer: a phase II study.

Authors:  E H Hernes; S D Fosså; S Vaage; P Ogreid; A Heilo; E Paus
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 7.640

6.  Randomized Phase II trial assessing estramustine and vinblastine combination chemotherapy vs estramustine alone in patients with progressive hormone-escaped metastatic prostate cancer.

Authors:  W Albrecht; H Van Poppel; S Horenblas; G Mickisch; A Horwich; V Serretta; G Casetta; J M Maréchal; W G Jones; S Kalman; R Sylvester
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.