BACKGROUND: Our recent findings in vitro in the human colon adenocarcinoma cell line HCT-8 suggest that resistance to fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer might be overcome by use of a different treatment schedule. PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that HCT-8 cells resistant to short-term 5-FU exposure retain sensitivity to continuous exposure and studied interactions between the two schedules. METHODS: HCT-8 cell lines resistant to short-term (pulse) treatment with 5-FU or to continuous exposure were obtained by six exposures to different concentrations of 5-FU for 4 hours or 7 days. We used a monolayer clonogenic assay to determine 5-FU-induced cell kill in resistant HCT-8 cells and sensitive parent cells. Parent cells were exposed to different concentrations of 5-FU for 1, 4, or 24 hours (short term), for 7 days (continuous exposure), or in a combination of both types of schedules. In a study of the mechanism of interaction between short-term and continuous exposure in parent cells, we performed flow cytometric DNA analysis to determine the percentage of cells in S phase and assays of thymidylate synthase inhibition in intact cells and of incorporation of [6-3H)]5-FU nucleotides into nucleic acids. RESULTS: Sensitive HCT-8 cells became fully resistant to 5-FU within five or six treatments, and low-dose continuous exposure almost immediately produced resistant clones. HCT-8 cells resistant to 5-FU given every 4 hours retained full sensitivity to continuous exposure, suggesting lack of cross-resistance between the two schedules, but cells resistant to continuous exposure were cross-resistant to short-term treatment. Parent cells showed a statistically significant (synergistic) enhancement of the cytotoxic activity for 5-FU exposure for 1 hour (100, 300, or 500 microM) followed by continuous exposure (0.5, 1, or 2 microM) or 4 hours (10, 30, or 60 microM) followed by continuous exposure (1 or 2 microM). Short-term plus continuous exposure produced a marked increase in percentage of S-phase cells, compared with the percentage for each schedule alone. The combination of 1-hour exposure and continuous exposure (1000 and 2 microM, respectively) produced a marked accumulation of cells in S phase at 24 hours (59%), which lasted up to 96 hours (53%). The combination of the two schedules produced only additive enhancement of thymidylate synthase inhibition as well as incorporation of [6-3H]5-FU nucleotides into nucleic acids of HCT-8 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a rationale for the use of bolus 5-FU and continuous infusion 5-FU in sequence. IMPLICATION: We are conducting a clinical trial of bolus methotrexate followed by continuous-infusion 5-FU plus leucovorin.
BACKGROUND: Our recent findings in vitro in the humancolon adenocarcinoma cell line HCT-8 suggest that resistance to fluorouracil (5-FU) in patients with advanced colorectal cancer might be overcome by use of a different treatment schedule. PURPOSE: We tested the hypothesis that HCT-8 cells resistant to short-term 5-FU exposure retain sensitivity to continuous exposure and studied interactions between the two schedules. METHODS: HCT-8 cell lines resistant to short-term (pulse) treatment with 5-FU or to continuous exposure were obtained by six exposures to different concentrations of 5-FU for 4 hours or 7 days. We used a monolayer clonogenic assay to determine 5-FU-induced cell kill in resistant HCT-8 cells and sensitive parent cells. Parent cells were exposed to different concentrations of 5-FU for 1, 4, or 24 hours (short term), for 7 days (continuous exposure), or in a combination of both types of schedules. In a study of the mechanism of interaction between short-term and continuous exposure in parent cells, we performed flow cytometric DNA analysis to determine the percentage of cells in S phase and assays of thymidylate synthase inhibition in intact cells and of incorporation of [6-3H)]5-FU nucleotides into nucleic acids. RESULTS: Sensitive HCT-8 cells became fully resistant to 5-FU within five or six treatments, and low-dose continuous exposure almost immediately produced resistant clones. HCT-8 cells resistant to 5-FU given every 4 hours retained full sensitivity to continuous exposure, suggesting lack of cross-resistance between the two schedules, but cells resistant to continuous exposure were cross-resistant to short-term treatment. Parent cells showed a statistically significant (synergistic) enhancement of the cytotoxic activity for 5-FU exposure for 1 hour (100, 300, or 500 microM) followed by continuous exposure (0.5, 1, or 2 microM) or 4 hours (10, 30, or 60 microM) followed by continuous exposure (1 or 2 microM). Short-term plus continuous exposure produced a marked increase in percentage of S-phase cells, compared with the percentage for each schedule alone. The combination of 1-hour exposure and continuous exposure (1000 and 2 microM, respectively) produced a marked accumulation of cells in S phase at 24 hours (59%), which lasted up to 96 hours (53%). The combination of the two schedules produced only additive enhancement of thymidylate synthase inhibition as well as incorporation of [6-3H]5-FU nucleotides into nucleic acids of HCT-8 cells. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide a rationale for the use of bolus 5-FU and continuous infusion 5-FU in sequence. IMPLICATION: We are conducting a clinical trial of bolus methotrexate followed by continuous-infusion 5-FU plus leucovorin.
Authors: C Aschele; A Guglielmi; G L Frassineti; C Milandri; D Amadori; R Labianca; M Vinci; L Tixi; C Caroti; E Ciferri; E Verdi; R Rosso; A Sobrero Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1998 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: A Sobrero; A Guglielmi; M Cirillo; E Recaldin; G L Frassineti; C Aschele; A Ravaioli; P Testore; C Caroti; L Gallo; M A Pessi; E Cortesi; D Turci; F Grossi; R Labianca Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2001-04-20 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: A V Patterson; H Zhang; A Moghaddam; R Bicknell; D C Talbot; I J Stratford; A L Harris Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 1995-09 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: A Guglielmi; S Barni; A Zaniboni; N Pella; O Belvedere; G D Beretta; F Grossi; L Frontini; F Puglisi; R Labianca; A Sobrero Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-10-18 Impact factor: 7.640