Literature DB >> 8229855

Projection of cat jaw muscle spindle afferents related to intrafusal fibre influence.

A Taylor1, R Durbaba, J F Rodgers.   

Abstract

1. A method of classification of muscle spindle afferents using succinylcholine (SCh) and ramp stretches has recently been described, which appears to estimate separately the strength of influence of bag1 (b1) and of bag2 (b2) intrafusal fibres. Increase in dynamic difference (delta DD) indicates b1 influence whilst increase in initial frequency (delta IF) indicates b2 influence. The significance of this classification has now been examined by correlation with the strength of synaptic projection of jaw muscle spindle afferents to the fifth motor nucleus (MotV) and the supratrigeminal region (STR) in anaesthetized cats. 2. Projection strength was estimated by computing the extracellular focal synaptic potential (FSP) from spike-triggered averages of 1024 sweeps at 100 microns intervals along tracks through STR and MotV. Trigger pulses were derived from spindle afferent cell bodies of the jaw-closer muscles recorded in the mesencephalic trigeminal nucleus, and characterized by the effect of SCh on their responses to ramp-and-hold stretches. 3. The maximum size of FSPs in tracks traversing STR and MotV ranged from 2.08 to 36.99 microV with a mean of 7.55 microV. The amplitudes were bimodally distributed into roughly equal-sized groups with high and low amplitude FSPs. 4. Mean values of delta IF were significantly greater for the group with large FSPs than for those with small FSPs. There were no significant differences in delta DD. FSP amplitude was significantly positively correlated with delta IF, but not with delta DD. 5. Spindle afferents with high values of FSP amplitude in MotV had a wide range of values of delta DD (b1b2c and b2c groups), while units with large FSPs in STR were all in the b2c category. Some evidence is presented to indicate that this reflects a preferential projection of secondary afferents to the STR. 6. For those units with projection to both STR and to MotV, there was a significant positive correlation between FSP amplitude in the two nuclei. 7. These results indicate that the extent of the b2 influence on spindle afferents predicts the central projection strength better than does the b1 influence. This finding is discussed from the viewpoint of possible developmental and functional issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8229855      PMCID: PMC1175451          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1993.sp019698

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  21 in total

1.  Postsynatpic population potentials recorded from ventral roots perfused with isotonic sucrose: connections of groups Ia and II spindle afferent fibers with large populations of motoneurons.

Authors:  H R Lüscher; P Ruenzel; E Fetz; E Henneman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Morphology of jaw-muscle spindle afferents in the rat.

Authors:  D Dessem; A Taylor
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1989-04-15       Impact factor: 3.215

3.  Monosynaptic connections between neurons of trigeminal mesencephalic nucleus and jaw-closing motoneurons in the rat: an intracellular horseradish peroxidase labelling study.

Authors:  P F Luo; J S Li
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1991-09-20       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Field potentials generated by group II muscle afferents in the middle lumbar segments of the cat spinal cord.

Authors:  S A Edgley; E Jankowska
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Possible interneurons responsible for reflex inhibition of motoneurons of jaw-closing muscles from the inferior dental nerve.

Authors:  Y Kidokoro; K Kubota; S Shuto; R Sumino
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Properties of single central Ia afferent fibres projecting to motoneurones.

Authors:  J B Munson; G W Sypert
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-11       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Extracellular spike triggered averaging for plotting synaptic projections.

Authors:  A Taylor; J A Stephens; G Somjen; K Appenteng; M J O'Donovan
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1978-01-27       Impact factor: 3.252

8.  The projection of jaw elevator muscle spindle afferents to fifth nerve motoneurones in the cat.

Authors:  K Appenteng; M J O'Donovan; G Somjen; J A Stephens; A Taylor
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-06       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 9.  Physiological properties of tandem muscle spindles in neck and hind-limb muscles.

Authors:  R F Price; M B Dutia
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.453

10.  The classification of afferents from muscle spindles of the jaw-closing muscles of the cat.

Authors:  A Taylor; R Durbaba; J F Rodgers
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  4 in total

1.  Spinal projection of spindle afferents of the longissimus lumborum muscles of the cat.

Authors:  R Durbaba; A Taylor; P H Ellaway; S Rawlinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Classification of longissimus lumborum muscle spindle afferents in the anaesthetized cat.

Authors:  R Durbaba; A Taylor; P H Ellaway; S Rawlinson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-01-12       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Segmental and supraspinal control of synaptic effectiveness of functionally identified muscle afferents in the cat.

Authors:  M Enríquez; I Jiménez; P Rudomin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The influence of pain on masseter spindle afferent discharge.

Authors:  Norman F Capra; Calvin K Hisley; Radi M Masri
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 2.633

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.