Literature DB >> 8229142

Role of magnetic resonance imaging in predicting relapse in residual masses after treatment of lymphoma.

M Hill1, D Cunningham, D MacVicar, A Roldan, J Husband, R McCready, J Mansi, S Milan, T Hickish.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This prospective study of patients treated at the Royal Marsden Hospital Lymphoma Unit was designed to evaluate the role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the assessment of residual masses evident on computed tomographic (CT) scanning following treatment of lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients had MRI, gallium-67 single-photon emission CT (67Ga SPECT), and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) performed within 3 months of completing therapy. Patients were monitored for 1 year posttreatment and observed for signs of relapse. Investigation results were correlated with disease status, and the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) calculated. Time-to-relapse curves were derived and the log-rank test used to determine whether patients with a positive result were more likely to have a relapse within the mass than those with a negative result.
RESULTS: Thirty-four patients were studied, 14 of whom relapsed, 11 within the area of residual mass. Overall, MRI had a high specificity (90%), PPV (71%), and NPV (75%), but poor sensitivity (45%). The results for 67Ga SPECT were similar, apart from lower sensitivity (33%). ESR had inferior performance in predicting relapse compared with the other tests. MRI was the only investigation to show statistical significance (P = .14) in predicting relapse, and this was particularly evident in Hodgkin's lymphoma (P = .003). Combining results of 67Ga SPECT and MRI did not improve predictive power.
CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate that MRI is a valuable tool in the setting of a residual mass after treatment, giving clinically useful prognostic information. 67Ga SPECT also has a role, but is less effective in predicting relapse than MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8229142     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.11.2273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  10 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of response to therapy using conventional imaging.

Authors:  Sheila C Rankin
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  FDG PET in response evaluation of bulky masses in paediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients enrolled in the Italian AIEOP-LH2004 trial.

Authors:  Egesta Lopci; Maurizio Mascarin; Arnoldo Piccardo; Angelo Castello; Caterina Elia; Luca Guerra; Eugenio Borsatti; Alessandra Sala; Alessandra Todesco; Pietro Zucchetta; Piero Farruggia; Angelina Cistaro; Salvatore Buffardi; Patrizia Bertolini; Maurizio Bianchi; Maria Luisa Moleti; Feisal Bunkheila; Paolo Indolfi; Franca Fagioli; Alberto Garaventa; Roberta Burnelli
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  [The value of gallium scintigraphy after the therapy of Hodgkin's disease].

Authors:  S Staar
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 4.  Positron emission tomography with [(18)F]FDG for therapy response monitoring in lymphoma patients.

Authors:  Karoline Spaepen; Sigrid Stroobants; Gregor Verhoef; Luc Mortelmans
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-04-23       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 5.  Monitoring tumour response.

Authors:  J E Husband
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Comparison of technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile and gallium-67 citrate scanning in the assessment of lymphomas.

Authors:  P Ziegels; M Nocaudie; D Huglo; M Deveaux; L Detourmignies; E Wattel; X Marchandise
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1995-02

Review 7.  [Radiological diagnostics of Hodgkin- and non-Hodgkin lymphomas of the thorax].

Authors:  M Uffmann; C Schaefer-Prokop
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 8.  The role of SPET and PET in monitoring tumour response to therapy.

Authors:  Chariklia Giannopoulou
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2003-06-14       Impact factor: 9.236

9.  Predictive role of positron emission tomography (PET) in the outcome of lymphoma patients.

Authors:  P L Zinzani; S Fanti; G Battista; M Tani; P Castellucci; V Stefoni; L Alinari; M Farsad; G Musuraca; A Gabriele; E Marchi; C Nanni; R Canini; N Monetti; M Baccarani
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Lymphoma: a clinical view.

Authors:  M Hill; N Maisey
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2000-10-11       Impact factor: 3.909

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.