Literature DB >> 8229046

Effect of spatial frequency on transient and steady-state VEPs: stimulation with checkerboard, square-wave grating and sinusoidal grating patterns.

S Tobimatsu1, S Kurita-Tashima, M Nakayama-Hiromatsu, M Kato.   

Abstract

We recorded VEPs to the alteration of checkerboard, square-wave grating and sinusoidal grating patterns to evaluate the contribution of the fundamental spatial frequency and higher harmonic components in 12 normal subjects. Their fundamental spatial frequencies were equated and ranged from 0.5 to 8.0 c/deg. Both the transient VEP (T-VEP) and steady-state VEP (S-VEP) were obtained. The latency and amplitude of P100 of T-VEPs were measured. S-VEPs were Fourier analyzed, and phase and amplitude of the second harmonic response were measured. The mean P100 latency and the mean phase had a U-shaped function with a peak at a fundamental spatial frequency of 2.0 c/deg irrespective of the stimulus patterns, while the mean P100 amplitude and the mean amplitude of S-VEPs did not show such spatial selectivity. At low and medium spatial frequencies, differences in P100 latency, phase and amplitude between pattern types were more pronounced. However, this difference became insignificant at high spatial frequencies. These results indicate that VEP responses are predominantly determined by the fundamental spatial frequency, and that the contribution of higher harmonics to VEP responses is not negligible. Our results are consistent with the concept that the human visual system may use spatial frequency-domain information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8229046     DOI: 10.1016/0022-510x(93)90239-u

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  9 in total

1.  Mechanism of binocular interaction in refraction errors: study using pattern-reversal visual evoked potentials.

Authors:  A di Summa; S Fusina; L Bertolasi; S Vicentini; S Perlini; L G Bongiovanni; A Polo
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  An electrophysiological dissociation of craving and stimulus-dependent attentional capture in smokers.

Authors:  Sarah E Donohue; Marty G Woldorff; Jens-Max Hopf; Joseph A Harris; Hans-Jochen Heinze; Mircea A Schoenfeld
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Effects of spatial frequency on visual evoked magnetic fields.

Authors:  Aki Tsuruhara; Yuko Nagata; Masaya Suzuki; Koji Inui; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-16       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Anti-fatigue Performance in SSVEP-Based Visual Acuity Assessment: A Comparison of Six Stimulus Paradigms.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Yubin Zhang; Renghao Liang; Kai Zhang; Yuhui Du; Jun Xie; Sicong Zhang
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 5.  Low-contrast Pattern-reversal Visual Evoked Potential in Different Spatial Frequencies.

Authors:  Homa Hassankarimi; Ebrahim Jafarzadehpur; Alireza Mohammadi; Seyed Mohammad Reza Noori
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2020-08-06

6.  VEP Responses to Op-Art Stimuli.

Authors:  Louise O'Hare; Alasdair D F Clarke; Petra M J Pollux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Meridian-Specific and Post-Optical Deficits of Spatial Vision in Human Astigmatism: Evidences From Psycho-Physical and EEG Scalings.

Authors:  Li Gu; Yiyao Wang; Lei Feng; Saiqun Li; Mengwei Zhang; Qingqing Ye; Yijing Zhuang; Zhong-Lin Lu; Jinrong Li; Jin Yuan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-03-17

8.  Visual evoked cortical potential (VECP) elicited by sinusoidal gratings controlled by pseudo-random stimulation.

Authors:  Carolina S Araújo; Givago S Souza; Bruno D Gomes; Luiz Carlos L Silveira
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Assessment of Human Visual Acuity Using Visual Evoked Potential: A Review.

Authors:  Xiaowei Zheng; Guanghua Xu; Kai Zhang; Renghao Liang; Wenqiang Yan; Peiyuan Tian; Yaguang Jia; Sicong Zhang; Chenghang Du
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.