Literature DB >> 8227867

Comparative performance of five commercial prick skin test devices.

H S Nelson1, D M Rosloniec, L I McCall, D Iklé.   

Abstract

Five commercially available devices for performing prick skin testing were compared for reproducibility, patient acceptance, occurrence of false-negative skin test results, and size distribution of reactions at the negative control sites. Reproducibility of skin testing with 10 mg/ml histamine base, as expressed by coefficient of variation, was similar. However, a clear range of trauma to the skin was produced by the devices. This trauma was least with the Hollister-Stier and ALK Laboratories lancets, intermediate for the bifurcated needle by either prick or puncture, and greatest for the Multi-Test and DermaPIK devices. The more traumatic devices produced larger mean wheals and more frequent and large reactions at saline control sites, and were less acceptable to subjects. However, except for the Multi-Test device, they less often yielded false-negative responses. It is proposed that for each device a different size of wheal must be produced at the allergen site to have confidence that it exceeds the control site. The wheal size necessary for 99% specificity were as follows: Hollister-Stier lancet, 2 mm; ALK lancet, 3.0 mm; bifurcated needle prick, 4.0 mm; bifurcated needle puncture, 4.5 mm; Multi-Test device, 5.0 mm; and DermaPIK device, 5.5 mm. An additional observation was the presence of a significant gradient of reaction size on the back to both histamine and allergen (p < 0.0001), with the smallest reactions in the upper third and the largest in the lower third of the back.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8227867     DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(93)90019-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0091-6749            Impact factor:   10.793


  8 in total

1.  Diagnostic tools in Rhinology EAACI position paper.

Authors:  Glenis Scadding; Peter Hellings; Isam Alobid; Claus Bachert; Wytske Fokkens; Roy Gerth van Wijk; Philippe Gevaert; Josep Guilemany; Livije Kalogjera; Valerie Lund; Joaquim Mullol; Giovanni Passalacqua; Elina Toskala; Cornelius van Drunen
Journal:  Clin Transl Allergy       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 5.871

2.  Dissociation between the prevalence of atopy and allergic disease in rural China among children and adults.

Authors:  Jennifer S Kim; Fengxiu Ouyang; Jacqueline A Pongracic; Yaping Fang; Binyan Wang; Xue Liu; Houxun Xing; Deanna Caruso; Xin Liu; Shanchun Zhang; Xiping Xu; Xiaobin Wang
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 10.793

3.  Risk and safety requirements for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in allergology: World Allergy Organization Statement.

Authors:  Marek L Kowalski; Ignacio Ansotegui; Werner Aberer; Mona Al-Ahmad; Mubeccel Akdis; Barbara K Ballmer-Weber; Kirsten Beyer; Miguel Blanca; Simon Brown; Chaweewan Bunnag; Arnaldo Capriles Hulett; Mariana Castells; Hiok Hee Chng; Frederic De Blay; Motohiro Ebisawa; Stanley Fineman; David B K Golden; Tari Haahtela; Michael Kaliner; Connie Katelaris; Bee Wah Lee; Joanna Makowska; Ulrich Muller; Joaquim Mullol; John Oppenheimer; Hae-Sim Park; James Parkerson; Giovanni Passalacqua; Ruby Pawankar; Harald Renz; Franziska Rueff; Mario Sanchez-Borges; Joaquin Sastre; Glenis Scadding; Scott Sicherer; Pongsakorn Tantilipikorn; James Tracy; Vera van Kempen; Barbara Bohle; G Walter Canonica; Luis Caraballo; Maximiliano Gomez; Komei Ito; Erika Jensen-Jarolim; Mark Larche; Giovanni Melioli; Lars K Poulsen; Rudolf Valenta; Torsten Zuberbier
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 4.084

4.  Authorised allergen products for intracutaneous testing may no longer be available in Germany: Allergy textbooks have to be re-written.

Authors:  Ludger Klimek; Thomas Werfel; Christian Vogelberg; Kirsten Jung
Journal:  Allergo J Int       Date:  2015-05-09

5.  Genome-wide association study identifies peanut allergy-specific loci and evidence of epigenetic mediation in US children.

Authors:  Xiumei Hong; Ke Hao; Christine Ladd-Acosta; Kasper D Hansen; Hui-Ju Tsai; Xin Liu; Xin Xu; Timothy A Thornton; Deanna Caruso; Corinne A Keet; Yifei Sun; Guoying Wang; Wei Luo; Rajesh Kumar; Ramsay Fuleihan; Anne Marie Singh; Jennifer S Kim; Rachel E Story; Ruchi S Gupta; Peisong Gao; Zhu Chen; Sheila O Walker; Tami R Bartell; Terri H Beaty; M Daniele Fallin; Robert Schleimer; Patrick G Holt; Kari Christine Nadeau; Robert A Wood; Jacqueline A Pongracic; Daniel E Weeks; Xiaobin Wang
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 6.  Diagnostic Tools in Allergic Rhinitis.

Authors:  Almudena Testera-Montes; Raquel Jurado; Maria Salas; Ibon Eguiluz-Gracia; Cristobalina Mayorga
Journal:  Front Allergy       Date:  2021-09-23

7.  Skin prick/puncture testing in North America: a call for standards and consistency.

Authors:  Shahnaz Fatteh; Donna J Rekkerth; James A Hadley
Journal:  Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 3.406

8.  The Lancet Weight Determines Wheal Diameter in Response to Skin Prick Testing with Histamine.

Authors:  Hjalte H Andersen; Anna Charlotte Lundgaard; Anne S Petersen; Lise E Hauberg; Neha Sharma; Sofie D Hansen; Jesper Elberling; Lars Arendt-Nielsen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.