Literature DB >> 8227784

Prehospital thrombolysis: beneficial effects of very early treatment on infarct size and left ventricular function.

T Linderer1, R Schröder, R Arntz, M L Heineking, W Wunderlich, K Kohl, F Forycki, R Henzgen, J Wagner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of very early (< or = 1.5 h after symptom onset) and later (> 1.5 up to 4 h) thrombolytic therapy on infarct size, left ventricular function and early mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. To start thrombolysis at the earliest possible moment, it was performed in the prehospital setting. A cutoff time of 1.5 h was prospectively stipulated.
BACKGROUND: Shortening of ischemic time is crucial within the 1st 2 h. Prehospital thrombolysis can reduce time to treatment and enables very early initiation of therapy for many patients.
METHODS: One hundred seventy patients received 30 mg of anistreplase up to 4 h from symptom onset by a mobile intensive care unit physician. Infarct size was measured from cumulative release of alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, and left ventricular function was assessed by contrast angiograms 10 days after the infarction.
RESULTS: The decision to treat on scene was correct in 98% of patients. There were no bleeding complications or deaths outside the hospital setting. In 28 patients (17%) the ischemic process was interrupted. Findings with thrombolytic therapy initiated < or = 1.5 (96 patients) versus > 1.5 h (74 patients) were the following: initial extent of epicardial injury, 1.6 +/- 0.9 versus 1.4 +/- 0.7 mV, p = NS; infarct size by cardiac enzyme release 646 +/- 634 versus 886 +/- 712 IU/liter, p < 0.05; ejection fraction 57 +/- 14% versus 51 +/- 13%, p < 0.05; regional dyssynergic area 24 +/- 22 versus 33 +/- 24 U, p < 0.05; 21-day mortality 1 of 96 versus 5 of 74 patients (1% vs. 7%, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that in evolving myocardial infarction up to 4 h in duration, the start of thrombolytic therapy at < or = 1.5 h compared with > 1.5 h limits infarct size, preserves left ventricular function and may save lives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8227784     DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(93)90534-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  7 in total

1.  A qualitative study of paramedics' attitudes to providing prehospital thrombolysis.

Authors:  L Price; P Keeling; G Brown; D Hughes; A Barton
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Non-invasive diagnosis of infarct artery patency after acute myocardial infarction by use of serial plasma troponin T concentrations: importance of measurement of peak levels.

Authors:  R M Norris; R N Johnson; H D White; D R Robinson
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Pre-hospital versus in-hospital thrombolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Michael McCaul; Andrit Lourens; Tamara Kredo
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-09-10

4.  The impact of time to thrombolytic treatment on outcome in patients with acute myocardial infarction. For the CORE investigators (Collaborative Organisation for RheothRx Evaluation).

Authors:  P Chareonthaitawee; R J Gibbons; R S Roberts; T F Christian; R Burns; S Yusuf
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 5.  Criteria for drug usage review of thrombolytics in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  S McGlynn
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 4.981

6.  Time as an Adjunctive Agent to Thrombolytic Therapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Prehospital thrombolysis--calculated health benefit for catchment population of one hospital.

Authors:  Mark Kroese; David Kanka; Peter Weissberg; Barbara Arch; John Scott
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 18.000

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.