Literature DB >> 8227748

Cue trading in the production and perception of vowel stress.

P Howell1.   

Abstract

The distinction between stressed and unstressed vowels in noun/verb pairs differentiated by stress (e.g., as in the word "misprint") is known to be cued by the acoustic attributes fundamental frequency, intensity, and duration. The role of these cues and vowel centralization measures in perception is ordered differently from that in production. It is not known what variability there is between speakers, whether the acoustic factors vary with speech clarity that a speaker produces on different occasions, or what the relationship is between the various speech attributes. Importantly, no studies have been performed in which production and perception of materials is compared with respect to these questions. In the current study, noun/verb pairs differentiated by stress were produced by four speakers, and measures of produced and perceived clarity obtained for these subjects. The importance of the acoustic factors to the contrast was modeled in perception and production, and the results compared. Additionally, the variation with produced or perceived clarity was ascertained. Finally, comparison between cue trading in production and perception was made. The results are discussed in connection with models of speech perception and production.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8227748     DOI: 10.1121/1.407479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  5 in total

1.  Lexical stress in childhood apraxia of speech: acoustic and kinematic findings.

Authors:  Hailey C Kopera; Maria I Grigos
Journal:  Int J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.484

2.  English Listeners Use Suprasegmental Cues to Lexical Stress Early During Spoken-Word Recognition.

Authors:  Alexandra Jesse; Katja Poellmann; Ying-Yee Kong
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-01-01       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin, and Russian speakers.

Authors:  Anna Chrabaszcz; Matthew Winn; Candise Y Lin; William J Idsardi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Responses to Intensity-Shifted Auditory Feedback During Running Speech.

Authors:  Rupal Patel; Kevin J Reilly; Erin Archibald; Shanqing Cai; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  Prosodic adaptations to pitch perturbation in running speech.

Authors:  Rupal Patel; Caroline Niziolek; Kevin Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.