Literature DB >> 8227574

Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast after limited surgery and radiation therapy.

S H Heywang-Köbrunner1, A Schlegel, R Beck, T Wendt, W Kellner, B Lommatzsch, M Untch, W B Nathrath.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Posttherapeutic changes in the breast after tumorectomy (TE) and radiation therapy (RT) may mimic or obscure recurrent or new malignancies and thus interfere with conventional diagnostic studies. We investigated the enhancement of tissue during variable time intervals after therapy with contrast-enhanced MRI in 62 patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We report the results of 77 studies in 62 patients undergoing TE and RT. We include only those studies with at least 24 months of clinical and mammographic follow-up (n = 60) or histopathologic results (n = 17).
RESULTS: Up to 9 months after therapy, differentiation between posttherapeutic changes and recurrence was frequently impossible because of the strong enhancement. Ten to 18 months after therapy, this posttherapeutic enhancement subsided slowly with some interindividual variations. After 18 months posttherapy, no significant enhancement was encountered in 30 of 32 cases. Diffuse or focal enhancement was present in all recurrent tumors and all recurrences were correctly diagnosed. Furthermore, 4 of 11 recurrences and 10 of 18 single recurrent foci were detected by MR alone, based on focal enhancement.
CONCLUSION: Accordingly, contrast-enhanced MR is not recommended during the first 9 months after therapy. Nine to 18 months after therapy, it may be helpful in those two-thirds of cases where the scar does not enhance. If enhancement takes place (one-third of cases), it may represent either scar or tumor, and in such circumstances, enhanced MR is of no value. After 18 months, enhanced MRI has proven a valuable additional tool. By correctly detecting or excluding recurrent tumor, it can significantly improve diagnostic accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8227574     DOI: 10.1097/00004728-199311000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr        ISSN: 0363-8715            Impact factor:   1.826


  10 in total

1.  [Suspected contrast medium concentration in dynamic MR-mammography. Post-traumatic fracture of the ribs].

Authors:  A Fink; K Wasser; D Aufderstrasse; H Ludemann; S Delorme
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 0.635

Review 2.  Imaging tumour angiogenesis.

Authors:  Tony Jeswani; Anwar R Padhani
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 3.  Breast lesions with high signal intensity on T1-weighted MR images.

Authors:  Irmak Durur-Subasi; Afak Durur-Karakaya; Fatih Alper; Adem Karaman; Rabia Mihriban Kılıc; Sare Sipal; Elif Demirci; Mufide Nuran Akcay
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.374

4.  In situ and minimally invasive breast cancer: morphologic and kinetic features on contrast-enhanced MR imaging.

Authors:  P Viehweg; D Lampe; J Buchmann; S H Heywang-Köbrunner
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Retrospective analysis for evaluation of the value of contrast-enhanced MRI in patients treated with breast conservative therapy.

Authors:  P Viehweg; A Heinig; D Lampe; J Buchmann; S H Heywang-Köbrunner
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Normal parenchymal enhancement patterns in women undergoing MR screening of the breast.

Authors:  Sanaz A Jansen; Vicky C Lin; Maryellen L Giger; Hui Li; Gregory S Karczmar; Gillian M Newstead
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Follow-up of women with breast cancer: comparison between MRI and FDG PET.

Authors:  Gerhard W Goerres; Sven C A Michel; Mathias K Fehr; Achim H Kaim; Hans C Steinert; Burkhardt Seifert; Gustav K von Schulthess; Rahel A Kubik-Huch
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2002-11-13       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  FDG-PET and other imaging modalities for the evaluation of breast cancer recurrence and metastases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  LingLing Pan; Yuan Han; XiaoGuang Sun; JianJun Liu; Huang Gang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-21       Impact factor: 4.553

9.  Magnetic resonance mammography in the evaluation of recurrence at the prior lumpectomy site after conservative surgery and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Lorenzo Preda; Gaetano Villa; Stefania Rizzo; Luca Bazzi; Daniela Origgi; Enrico Cassano; Massimo Bellomi
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Breast MRI: guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging.

Authors:  R M Mann; C K Kuhl; K Kinkel; C Boetes
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.