Literature DB >> 8226917

Differential recognition of OR1 and OR3 by bacteriophage 434 repressor and Cro.

G B Koudelka1, C Y Lam.   

Abstract

The developmental decisions of bacteriophage 434 depend on the ability of 434 repressor and Cro to bind OR1 and OR3 with different relative affinities; repressor binds OR1 tighter than OR3, whereas Cro slightly prefers OR3 over OR1. Studies with operator mutants show that repressor's lower relative affinity for OR3 results from a deviation in the sequence of OR3 from consensus; an A-->G change at position 4 in one half-site (OR1: A-C-A-A-A-C-T-T-T-C-T-T-G-T; OR3: A-C-A-G-T-T-T-T-T-C-T-T-G-T). Similar experiments show that Cro binds operators containing either A.T or G.C bases pairs at position 4 equally well, but cannot bind operators containing C.G or T.A base pairs at this position. A Gln33-->Ala mutation in 434 repressor diminishes, but does not eliminate, its ability to distinguish between purines at position 4. This shows that a glutamine at amino acid 33 is not the sole determinant of repressor's position 4 specificity. Changing Gln33-->Leu, the amino acid at the homologous position in Cro, does not confer "Cro-like" position 4 base specificity on repressor. Similarly, a Cro protein bearing Gln at this position does not exhibit repressor's position 4 base preferences. The residual specificities of these mutant proteins indicates that in each protein, more than 1 amino acid is responsible for recognizing bases at position 4. These were identified by analyzing the binding specificities of multiply mutated repressors, in vitro. The types of substitutions made were guided by sequence homologies between 434 repressor and Cro. At least three mutations are needed to eliminate repressor's position 4 base specificity; Gln33-->Ala, Glu32-->Gln, and Thr27-->Lys, although no set of amino acid substitutions in repressor was able to confer Cro-like position 4 specificity to repressor. These results indicate that at least the amino acids at these positions are involved in recognition of the position 4 base. Other evidence suggests that Cro and repressor use identical amino acids present at homologous positions in the DNA recognition helix in different ways.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8226917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  10 in total

1.  Combinatorial redesign of the DNA binding specificity of a prokaryotic helix-turn-helix repressor.

Authors:  Katja Fromknecht; Pia D Vogel; John G Wise
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  A λ Cro-Like Repressor Is Essential for the Induction of Conjugative Transfer of SXT/R391 Elements in Response to DNA Damage.

Authors:  Dominic Poulin-Laprade; Vincent Burrus
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2015-10-05       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 3.  Anaerobic catabolism of aromatic compounds: a genetic and genomic view.

Authors:  Manuel Carmona; María Teresa Zamarro; Blas Blázquez; Gonzalo Durante-Rodríguez; Javier F Juárez; J Andrés Valderrama; María J L Barragán; José Luis García; Eduardo Díaz
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 11.056

4.  Recognition of DNA by single-chain derivatives of the phage 434 repressor: high affinity binding depends on both the contacted and non-contacted base pairs.

Authors:  J Chen; S Pongor; A Simoncsits
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1997-06-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Three enhancements to the inference of statistical protein-DNA potentials.

Authors:  Mohammed AlQuraishi; Harley H McAdams
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2012-11-12

6.  The Bacillus subtilis regulator SinR inhibits spoIIG promoter transcription in vitro without displacing RNA polymerase.

Authors:  M A Cervin; R J Lewis; J A Brannigan; G B Spiegelman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Pushing the limits of what is achievable in protein-DNA docking: benchmarking HADDOCK's performance.

Authors:  Marc van Dijk; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Information-driven protein-DNA docking using HADDOCK: it is a matter of flexibility.

Authors:  Marc van Dijk; Aalt D J van Dijk; Victor Hsu; Rolf Boelens; Alexandre M J J Bonvin
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-07-04       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Competition between VanU(G) repressor and VanR(G) activator leads to rheostatic control of vanG vancomycin resistance operon expression.

Authors:  Florence Depardieu; Vincent Mejean; Patrice Courvalin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  An affinity-structure database of helix-turn-helix: DNA complexes with a universal coordinate system.

Authors:  Mohammed AlQuraishi; Shengdong Tang; Xide Xia
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-11-19       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.