Literature DB >> 8226140

Interruptions of high-dose radiation therapy decrease long-term survival of favorable patients with unresectable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung: analysis of 1244 cases from 3 Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials.

J D Cox1, T F Pajak, S Asbell, A H Russell, J Pederson, R W Byhardt, B Emami, M Roach.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if prolonged treatment time adversely affects survival for patients with inoperable non-small cell carcinoma of the lung. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients enrolled on three randomized studies (RTOG 8311, 8321, 8403) between 1983-1989 formed the database. Previous analyses found that the addition of thymosin (8321) or prophylactic cranial irradiation (8403) failed to prolong survival: both studies used thoracic irradiation with standard fractionation to 55-60 Gy in 30 fractions. In 8311, patients were treated by hyperfractionated radiation therapy to randomly assigned total doses of 60.0 Gy, 64.8 Gy, 69.6 Gy, 74.4 Gy or 79.2 Gy, 1.2 Gy twice daily, 5 days per week. Patients analyzed received +/- 4% of the assigned total dose and lived > 90 days (to ensure that all patients would have completed treatment). Completion < 5 days beyond protocol specifications was classified as "per protocol." Elapsed treatment time exceeding specifications by 5-9 days was a minor deviation, 10-13 days was a major deviation-acceptable, and > or = 14 days was a major deviation-unacceptable. Absolute survival was the endpoint to evaluate the effect of delays. The log rank statistic was used to test for survival differences in the univariate setting, the Cox regression model was used in the multivariate setting.
RESULTS: Of 293 patients treated with standard fractionation, eight (2.7%) had deviations from the specified treatment time (six minor, two major-acceptable). With hyperfractionation, 90 (15%) patients had deviations (40 minor, 21 major-acceptable, 29 major-unacceptable). As the assigned dose increased, the deviation rate increased (9.7% for 60.0 Gy vs. 20.8% for 79.2 Gy). Survivals for hyperfractionation patients with any deviations in treatment time were significantly shorter than those treated "per protocol" (p = 0.16): estimated 2- and 5-years rates were 24% and 10% versus 13% and 3%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed the delay effect to be entirely in patients treated with 69.6 Gy or higher; there was also dependence upon the patients' prognosis. In patients with favorable prognosis (KPS 90-100, weight loss < or = 5%, no N3), the difference in survival was pronounced (33% and 15% vs. 14% and 0% at 2- and 5-years, respectively). Such differences were not found in patients with unfavorable prognostic factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Interruptions delaying completion of planned radiation therapy were more frequent with higher total doses (> or = 69.6 Gy). Favorable patients (high KPS, little weight loss, < N3 nodal metastasis) had markedly adverse effects on long-term survival associated with delays to completion of the planned total dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8226140     DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(93)90371-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  36 in total

Review 1.  Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  E E Cohen; E E Vokes
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2001-02

Review 2.  Radiation dose-volume effects in the esophagus.

Authors:  Maria Werner-Wasik; Ellen Yorke; Joseph Deasy; Jiho Nam; Lawrence B Marks
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 3.  Novel approaches of chemoradiotherapy in unresectable stage IIIA and stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Thomas E Stinchcombe; Jeffrey A Bogart
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-04-24

4.  Compliance to the prescribed overall treatment time (OTT) of curative radiotherapy in normal clinical practice and impact on treatment duration of counteracting short interruptions by treating patients on Saturdays.

Authors:  M Maciá I Garau; J Solé Monné; M J Cambra Serés; C Monfà Binefa; M Peraire Llopis
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 5.  Palliative radiotherapy regimens for patients with thoracic symptoms from non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Rosemary Stevens; Fergus Macbeth; Elizabeth Toy; Bernadette Coles; Jason F Lester
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-01-14

6.  Prognostic Impact of Missed Chemotherapy Doses During Chemoradiation Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Matthew P Deek; Sinae Kim; Inaya Ahmed; Bruno S Fang; Wei Zou; Jyoti Malhotra; Joseph Aisner; Salma K Jabbour
Journal:  Am J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.339

Review 7.  Esophagitis, treatment-related toxicity in non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Voichita Bar-Ad; Nitin Ohri; Maria Werner-Wasik
Journal:  Rev Recent Clin Trials       Date:  2012-02

8.  Limited-stage small cell lung cancer: local failure after concurrent chemoradiotherapy with use of accelerated hyperfractionation.

Authors:  Takuhito Tada; Masako Hosono; Yoshie Takada; Shinzo Kudoh; Kentaro Ishii; Ryo Ogino; Shinichi Tsutsumi
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 2.374

9.  Analysis of the risk factors for myelosuppression after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Nan Jiang; Xiao-Cen Chen; Yue Zhao
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2012-08-31       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Treatment outcomes of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Seung-Gu Yeo; Moon-June Cho; Sun-Young Kim; Seung-Pyung Lim; Ki-Hwan Kim; Jun-Sang Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2005-10-31       Impact factor: 4.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.