Literature DB >> 8224682

Techniques and complications of esophageal foreign body extraction in children and adults.

P J Berggreen1, E Harrison, R A Sanowski, K Ingebo, B Noland, S Zierer.   

Abstract

To assess the success rates and complications of esophageal foreign body extraction in adult and pediatric patients, the charts of 76 adults and 116 children with endoscopically or radiographically documented esophageal foreign body impaction were retrospectively reviewed. Success rates for rigid esophagoscopy (100%) and flexible endoscopy (96.2%) were not significantly different (p > 0.05). Overall, rigid esophagoscopy had a higher complication rate than flexible endoscopy (10% versus 5.1%, p > 0.05), but this trend did not reach statistical significance. The Foley catheter technique was used predominantly in children with proximally located blunt objects. Our study shows that flexible and rigid esophagoscopy are both safe and effective methods of removing esophageal foreign bodies, but rigid esophagoscopy carries a higher complication rate and therefore should be reserved for patients in whom flexible endoscopy is unsuccessful. The Foley catheter technique is suited only for proximally located blunt objects, and its routine use is not recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8224682     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(93)70212-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  23 in total

1.  Therapeutic gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  S K Yachha; A Srivastava; B C Sharma; A Khanduri; S S Baijal
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  1996 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.967

Review 2.  Review of food bolus management.

Authors:  Hin Hin Ko; Robert Enns
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 3.522

Review 3.  Therapeutic upper gastrointestinal tract endoscopy in Paediatric Gastroenterology.

Authors:  Imdadur Rahman; Praful Patel; Philip Boger; Shahnawaz Rasheed; Mike Thomson; Nadeem Ahmad Afzal
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2015-03-16

4.  Homicide or suicide? Xylophagia: a possible explanation for extraordinary autopsy findings.

Authors:  Anke Klein; Carolin Schröder; Axel Heinemann; Klaus Püschel
Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol       Date:  2014-04-13       Impact factor: 2.007

5.  An ingested foreign body: two sides of the same coin?

Authors:  Kiran Varadharajan; Jennifer Magill; Kalpesh Patel
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2014-04-09

Review 6.  The management of oesophageal soft food bolus obstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  D Leopard; S Fishpool; S Winter
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Pharmacoradiologic disimpaction of lower esophageal foreign bodies: should we abandon it?

Authors:  D D Maglinte
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.438

8.  Esophageal foreign body extraction in children: flexible versus rigid endoscopy.

Authors:  Jillian Popel; Hamdy El-Hakim; Wael El-Matary
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-08-24       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Esophageal foreign bodies and eosinophilic esophagitis--the need for esophageal mucosal biopsy: a 12-year survey across pediatric subspecialties.

Authors:  Paul Williams; Samuel Jameson; Phyllis Bishop; David Sawaya; Michael Nowicki
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-01-26       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Flexible versus rigid endoscopy for treatment of foreign body impaction in the esophagus.

Authors:  D Gmeiner; B H A von Rahden; C Meco; J Hutter; G Oberascher; H J Stein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-03-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.