Literature DB >> 8223829

Amlodipine in patients with angina uncontrolled by atenolol. A double blind placebo controlled cross over trial.

P A Woodmansey1, A G Stewart, A H Morice, K S Channer.   

Abstract

Dihydropyridine calcium antagonists are established second line treatment for angina uncontrolled by beta-adrenergic blockers. Amlodipine is a recently introduced, dihydropyridine with a long half life. In a double blind, placebo controlled, cross over trial we assessed the efficacy and safety of amlodipine in 20 patients with persistent angina despite treatment with atenolol. 17 male patients (mean age 58 y) completed the study. Two patients were withdrawn during placebo because of worsening angina and one withdrew whilst on amlodipine because of palpitations. Compared with baseline, amlodipine prolonged exercise time to S-T segment depression by a median of 12.5%; significantly more than was found with placebo (median 0%). The improvement in exercise time and time to angina also tended to be greater for amlodipine than placebo. GTN consumption, at a median of 1.3/week, was significantly less with amlodipine than placebo (2.8). Attacks of angina were also reduced. Standing systolic and diastolic blood pressures and sitting systolic blood pressure were lower with amlodipine than placebo. Heart rate did not change. There was no change in cardiac output (measured by doppler aortovelography) when amlodipine was added to atenolol. Holter monitor measurements of 24 h maximum and minimum heart rate, heart rate variation and extrasystole counts were the same for amlodipine and placebo. In conclusion, amlodipine is effective in patients with angina inadequately controlled by atenolol alone, and does not interfere with cardiac rhythm or function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8223829     DOI: 10.1007/bf00315489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  19 in total

1.  Calcium antagonist caution.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-04-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 2.  Calcium antagonists in patients with heart failure. A review.

Authors:  H Reicher-Reiss; E Barasch
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Amlodipine versus nadolol in patients with stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  S Singh; J Doherty; V Udhoji; K Smith; J Gorwit; S Bekheit; S Mather; W Stein; J San Fellippo; P Hearan
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.749

Review 4.  High-dose monotherapy and combination therapy with calcium channel blockers for angina. A comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  L P Temkin
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  1989-01-16       Impact factor: 4.965

5.  Minimization: a new method of assigning patients to treatment and control groups.

Authors:  D R Taves
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Efficacy of nifedipine and isosorbide mononitrate in combination with atenolol in stable angina.

Authors:  F Akhras; G Jackson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-10-26       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 7.  Amlodipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  D Murdoch; R C Heel
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Relative effects of fat-, carbohydrate- and protein-containing liquid diets on cardiac output in healthy adult subjects.

Authors:  S K Hawley; K S Channer
Journal:  Clin Sci (Lond)       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 6.124

Review 9.  Comparative pharmacology of calcium antagonists: nifedipine, verapamil and diltiazem.

Authors:  P D Henry
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1980-12-01       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 10.  The role of triple therapy in patients with chronic stable angina pectoris.

Authors:  M H Crawford
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 29.690

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Amlodipine. A reappraisal of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  M Haria; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  North of England evidence based guidelines development project: summary version of evidence based guideline for the primary care management angina. North of England Stable Angina Guideline Development Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-03-30

3.  Rationale and design of the Medical Research Council's Precision Medicine with Zibotentan in Microvascular Angina (PRIZE) trial.

Authors:  Andrew J Morrow; Thomas J Ford; Kenneth Mangion; Tushar Kotecha; Roby Rakhit; Gavin Galasko; Stephen Hoole; Anthony Davenport; Rajesh Kharbanda; Vanessa M Ferreira; Mayooran Shanmuganathan; Amedeo Chiribiri; Divaka Perera; Haseeb Rahman; Jayanth R Arnold; John P Greenwood; Michael Fisher; Dirk Husmeier; Nicholas A Hill; Xiaoyu Luo; Nicola Williams; Laura Miller; Jill Dempster; Peter W Macfarlane; Paul Welsh; Naveed Sattar; Andrew Whittaker; Alex Mc Connachie; Sandosh Padmanabhan; Colin Berry
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 4.749

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.