Literature DB >> 8223788

Comparison of umbilical arterial versus umbilical venous blood pH correlated with arterio-venous glucose difference and cardiotocographic score.

W Nikischin1, E Lehmann-Willenbrock, D Weisner, H D Oldigs, J Schaub.   

Abstract

The value of clinical parameters and umbilical arterial blood pH as indicator of prenatal hypoxia is disputed. In a prospective study of 86 vaginally delivered full-term infants, cardiotocographic (CTG) findings obtained 0-30 min and 30-60 min before birth were compared to pH values, O2 and CO2 partial pressures and glucose difference in umbilical arterial and venous blood. CTG findings were expressed as a score, higher values indicating fetal hypoxia. The venous but not the arterial blood pH was significantly related to the later (0-30 min) CTG score. The arterio-venous glucose difference was significantly related to both CTG scores. There was a significant statistical relationship between glucose difference and venous but not arterial blood pH. The later CTG score (0-30 min) also correlated significantly with O2 and CO2 partial pressures and base excess in the umbilical vein of all vaginally born infants. If CTG is accepted as an objective indicator of fetal hypoxia before birth, the arterio-venous glucose difference, and in the investigated range of pH-values, umbilical venous blood pH are more suitable than the arterial blood pH to ascertain the peripartal situation of the newborn.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8223788     DOI: 10.1007/bf02073383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Pediatr        ISSN: 0340-6199            Impact factor:   3.183


  20 in total

1.  Uptake of exogenous substrates during hypoxia in fetal lambs.

Authors:  J R Milley
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1988-05

2.  Perinatal glucose metabolism as an indicator for stress and hypoxia during different forms of delivery.

Authors:  W Nikischin; D Weisner; H D Oldigs
Journal:  J Perinat Med       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.901

3.  [Significance of a general umbilical-cord pH for the evaluation of acidosis morbidity].

Authors:  S Böhm
Journal:  Zentralbl Gynakol       Date:  1978

4.  Routine umbilical cord blood gas determinations?

Authors:  J A Thorp; J E Sampson; V M Parisi; R K Creasy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  [Cardiotocographic diagnosis of fetal hazard using a CTG-score].

Authors:  K Hammacher; R Brun del Re; R Gaudenz; P De Grandi; R Richter
Journal:  Gynakol Rundsch       Date:  1974

6.  Apgar score, meconium and acidaemia at birth in relation to neonatal neurological morbidity in term infants.

Authors:  M J Dijxhoorn; G H Visser; V J Fidler; B C Touwen; H J Huisjes
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1986-03

7.  pH values in the human fetus during labor.

Authors:  J Bretscher; E Saling
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1967-04-01       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  Umbilical cord blood pH and Apgar scores as an index of neonatal health.

Authors:  B E Josten; T R Johnson; J P Nelson
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 8.661

9.  Correlation of the one-minute Apgar score and the pH value of umbilical arterial blood.

Authors:  L M Fields; S S Entman; F H Boehm
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 0.954

10.  Umbilical venous blood pH: a useful aid in the diagnosis of asphyxia at birth.

Authors:  S W D'Souza; P Black; J Cadman; B Richards
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1983-01       Impact factor: 3.791

View more
  1 in total

1.  Human fetoplacental arterial and venous endothelial cells are differentially programmed by gestational diabetes mellitus, resulting in cell-specific barrier function changes.

Authors:  Silvija Cvitic; Boris Novakovic; Lavinia Gordon; Christine M Ulz; Magdalena Mühlberger; Francisca I Diaz-Perez; Jihoon E Joo; Vendula Svendova; Michael G Schimek; Slave Trajanoski; Richard Saffery; Gernot Desoye; Ursula Hiden
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 10.122

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.