Literature DB >> 8222689

Ventilatory drive and carbon dioxide response in ventilatory failure due to myasthenia gravis and Guillain-Barré syndrome.

C O Borel1, J S Teitelbaum, D F Hanley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that either decreased ventilatory drive or decreased CO2 responsiveness accounts for the hypoventilation observed in patients during acute ventilatory failure from myasthenia gravis or Guillain-Barré syndrome.
DESIGN: Prospective, consecutive case series evaluating trials of ventilatory muscle performance, ventilatory drive, and CO2 response in patients during recovery from ventilatory failure until they were weaned from mechanical ventilation.
SETTING: Neurosciences critical care unit in a university hospital. PATIENTS: Seven intubated, mechanically ventilated patients with myasthenia gravis or Guillain-Barré syndrome.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients repeatedly performed mechanically unsupported, spontaneous breathing trials to the limits of endurance. After spontaneous breathing trials, patients underwent CO2 rebreathing studies.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Seventy-three breathing trials were performed in three patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome and four patients with myasthenia gravis. Patients were unable to sustain spontaneous ventilation in 55 trials averaging 27 +/- 5 mins. In these trials, significant increases occurred in mean end-tidal CO2 (41 +/- 1 to 44 +/- 1 torr [5.6 +/- 0.1 to 6.0 +/- 0.1 kPa]) and respiratory rate (31 +/- 1 to 35 +/- 1 breaths/min, p < .01). Ventilatory drive (as measured by airway occlusion pressure for 100 msecs) increased significantly p < .01 from 3.7 +/- 0.3 to 4.9 +/- 0.3 cm H2O. The response of airway occlusion pressure to CO2 rebreathing after these trials was 0.33 +/- 0.07 cm H2O/sec/mm Hg, while the minute ventilation response to CO2 rebreathing was only 0.30 +/- 0.06 L/min/mm Hg.
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that ventilatory drive increases during acute hypoventilation, and the ventilatory drive response to CO2 remains intact, even when the minute ventilation response to CO2 is poor. Therefore, a decrease in ventilatory drive or CO2 response is unlikely to account for hypoventilation during ventilatory failure in patients with myasthenia gravis or Guillain-Barré syndrome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8222689     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199311000-00022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  4 in total

1.  Vital capacity versus maximal inspiratory pressure in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome and myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  Hélène Prigent; David Orlikowski; Nadège Letilly; Line Falaize; Djilali Annane; Tarek Sharshar; Frédéric Lofaso
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.210

2.  Methods and Applications in Respiratory Physiology: Respiratory Mechanics, Drive and Muscle Function in Neuromuscular and Chest Wall Disorders.

Authors:  Nina Patel; Kelvin Chong; Ahmet Baydur
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 4.755

3.  The repeated measurement of vital capacity is a poor predictor of the need for mechanical ventilation in myasthenia gravis.

Authors:  P Rieder; M Louis; P Jolliet; J C Chevrolet
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Guillain-Barré syndrome: rehabilitation outcome and recent developments.

Authors:  E M Melillo; J M Sethi; V Mohsenin
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.