Literature DB >> 8222653

One-year experience with subdermal contraceptive implants in the United States.

M L Frank1, A N Poindexter, L M Cornin, C A Cox, L Bateman.   

Abstract

Women who received Norplant contraceptive implants from any of fifteen clinical settings in southeast Texas, U.S.A., were followed for one year to determine their reactions to the method. Of 1,385 who enrolled to receive Norplant implants, 1,253 had implants inserted. Side effects were reported by 78% of those receiving implants and 70% described changes in bleeding patterns. Spotting or irregular bleeding, weight gain and headaches were the conditions reported most frequently. Nine pregnancies were reported during the study period. Six of these, however, existed before the implants were inserted. At the one year anniversary, 143 of women receiving implants had had them removed. Those who discontinued method use were less satisfied, reported more side effects and were more likely to have planned to have another child, thus using the method for spacing, or to have had a change in their marital status while they were using the contraceptive. Providers should counsel patients to focus attention on plans for the future in selecting their contraceptive method. In addition, we recommend, as does the product's distributor, that providers confirm that patients are not pregnant prior to inserting implants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acceptor Characteristics; Acceptors; Americas; Behavior; Clinical Research; Clinical Trials; Contraception; Contraception Termination--indications; Contraceptive Agents; Contraceptive Agents, Female; Contraceptive Agents, Progestin; Contraceptive Implants--side effects; Contraceptive Methods--side effects; Contraceptive Usage; Developed Countries; Family Planning; Family Planning Programs; Follow-up Studies; Levonorgestrel; Method Acceptability; North America; Northern America; Psychological Factors; Research Methodology; Satisfaction; Studies; Texas; United States

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8222653     DOI: 10.1016/0010-7824(93)90142-t

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  7 in total

1.  Biodegradable Polymeric Injectable Implants for Long-Term Delivery of Contraceptive Drugs.

Authors:  Ohan S Manoukian; Michael R Arul; Naseem Sardashti; Teagan Stedman; Roshan James; Swetha Rudraiah; Sangamesh G Kumbar
Journal:  J Appl Polym Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.125

2.  Factors associated with elective Norplant removal in black and white women.

Authors:  J U Opara; F A Ernst; H Gaskin; L Smith; H V Nevels
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 1.798

Review 3.  Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. Contraception on trial.

Authors:  M L Frank; C DiMaria
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Norplant selection and satisfaction among low-income women.

Authors:  L L Clarke; K Schmitt; C A Bono; J Steele; M K Miller
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.308

Review 5.  Levonorgestrel subdermal implants. A review of contraceptive efficacy and acceptability.

Authors:  A J Coukell; J A Balfour
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  Risks and benefits, advantages and disadvantages of levonorgestrel-releasing contraceptive implants.

Authors:  Irving Sivin
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 7.  Complications of Subcutaneous Contraception: A Review.

Authors:  Rebecca C Ramdhan; Emily Simonds; Charlotte Wilson; Marios Loukas; Rod J Oskouian; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-01-31
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.