Literature DB >> 8222097

Aspirin versus heparin to prevent myocardial infarction during the acute phase of unstable angina.

P Théroux1, D Waters, S Qiu, J McCans, P de Guise, M Juneau.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and antithrombotic therapy with heparin both prevent the complications of unstable angina; however, no definitive data exist on the relative clinical efficacy of the two drugs. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Aspirin (325 mg bid) or heparin (5000-U intravenous bolus followed by a perfusion titrated to the APTT) were compared in a double-blind randomized trial of 484 patients in two cohorts enrolled sequentially. The study was initiated at admission to hospital at a mean of 8.3 +/- 7.8 hours after the last episode of pain. End points were assessed 5.7 +/- 3.3 days later, when the decision for long-term management was made. Myocardial infarction occurred in 2 (0.8%) of the 240 patients randomized to heparin and in 9 (3.7%) of the 244 randomized to aspirin (P = .035), an odds ratio of 0.22 and a risk difference of 2.9% (95% confidence limits, 0.3% to 5.6%) with heparin. The only death resulted from a myocardial infarction in an aspirin patient. Survival curves with Cox logistic regression analysis showed that the improvement in survival without myocardial infarction with heparin (P = .035) was independent of other baseline characteristics.
CONCLUSIONS: This study documents that heparin prevents myocardial infarction better than aspirin during the acute phase of unstable angina.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8222097     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.88.5.2045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  40 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the medical management of acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  C P Cannon
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.300

Review 2.  Guideline for the management of patients with acute coronary syndromes without persistent ECG ST segment elevation. British Cardiac Society Guidelines and Medical Practice Committee and Royal College of Physicians Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit.

Authors: 
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Proceedings of the 4th Invitational Wintergreen Conference. Wintergreen, Virginia, USA. July 12-14, 1998. Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  1999 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: perspectives on combination therapy.

Authors:  R P Villareal; P Kim; J J Ferguson; J M Wilson
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2001

Review 5.  The role of low-molecular-weight heparins in the management of unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  M Cohen
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  Unstable Angina.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-02

7.  Which heparin and how much?

Authors:  Peter E Ruchin; Marino Labinaz
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  [Myocardial revascularization].

Authors:  H Möllmann; S Szardien; J Kempfert; H Nef; C Liebetrau; T Walther; C Hamm
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.443

Review 9.  Contemporary management of acute coronary syndrome.

Authors:  G A Large
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 10.  Enoxaparin. A review of its clinical potential in the management of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S Noble; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.