Literature DB >> 8221480

Physical abuse in pregnancy.

D E Stewart1, A Cecutti.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of physical abuse during late pregnancy and to investigate how abused and nonabused pregnant women differ in demographic characteristics, health habits, psychologic distress and attitudes about fetal health.
DESIGN: Survey of women attending for prenatal health care or admitted to hospital for delivery. The information was obtained on one occasion from self-report questionnaires, completed with the option of anonymity. SETTINGS: Community-based prenatal clinic, private obstetricians' offices in a large city, private family physicians' offices in a large city, family physicians' offices in a small town, and a university teaching hospital. PATIENTS: English-speaking women at 20 weeks' or more gestation attending or admitted consecutively.
INTERVENTIONS: Three self-report questionnaires: the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ), the Fetal Health Locus of Control (FHLC) and the study questionnaire.
RESULTS: Thirteen women (2.4%) refused to participate in the survey. Of the 548 women who completed the questionnaires 36 (6.6%) reported physical abuse during the current pregnancy and 60 (10.9%) before it. There were no significant differences in rates of abuse between settings. Of the women abused during the pregnancy 23 (63.9%) reported increased abuse during the pregnancy, and 28 (77.8%) remained with the abuser. Twenty-four pregnant women (66.7%) received medical treatment for abuse, but only 1 (2.8%) told her prenatal care provider of the abuse. Factor analysis revealed three factors associated with physical abuse in pregnancy: "social instability" (comprising low age, unmarried status, lower level of education, unemployment and unplanned pregnancy), "unhealthy lifestyle" (comprising poor diet, alcohol use, illicit drug use and emotional problems) and "physical health problems" (comprising health problems and prescription drug use). The GHQ scores showed that the abused women were significantly more emotionally distressed than the nonabused women (p < 0.001). The FHLC scores showed that the abused women believed they had little "internal control" over the health of their fetuses and that "chance" played the most important role in the outcome of their pregnancy (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Abused pregnant patients are a frequently undetected high-risk group. Prenatal care should include a routine screening question about domestic violence, and identified patients should be appropriately counselled and referred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8221480      PMCID: PMC1485709     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ        ISSN: 0820-3946            Impact factor:   8.262


  23 in total

1.  Violence, values, and gender.

Authors:  A H Flitcraft
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-06-17       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Fetal health locus of control scale: development and validation.

Authors:  S M Labs; S K Wurtele
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1986-12

3.  Presidential address. Family violence--myths, measures and mandates.

Authors:  Q Rae-Grant
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 4.356

4.  Development of the Multidimensional Health Locus of Control (MHLC) Scales.

Authors:  K A Wallston; B S Wallston; R DeVellis
Journal:  Health Educ Monogr       Date:  1978

5.  Wife battering: an emerging problem in public health.

Authors:  S E Nuttall; L J Greaves; B Lent
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  1985 Sep-Oct

6.  Battered wife syndrome.

Authors:  R W Swanson
Journal:  Can Med Assoc J       Date:  1984-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

7.  Overview: the "wife-beater's wife" reconsidered.

Authors:  E Hilberman
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 18.112

8.  Emotional and physical health problems of battered women.

Authors:  P Jaffe; D A Wolfe; S Wilson; L Zak
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 4.356

9.  Physical abuse in pregnancy.

Authors:  P J Hillard
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Family violence and psychiatric disorder.

Authors:  R Bland; H Orn
Journal:  Can J Psychiatry       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.356

View more
  56 in total

1.  Where are the Canadian data?

Authors:  B Lent
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Understanding the effect of domestic violence on pregnancy, labour, and delivery.

Authors:  B Lent; P Morris; S Rechner
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Physical abuse during pregnancy: a significant threat to maternal and child health.

Authors:  H L MacMillan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-04-06       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Can the health care system buy better antibiotic prescribing behaviour?

Authors:  M A Levine; A Pradhan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-04-06       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Abuse during pregnancy: a quintessential threat to maternal and child health--so when do we start to act?

Authors:  J C Campbell
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-29       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Violence and reproductive health: current knowledge and future research directions.

Authors:  J A Gazmararian; R Petersen; A M Spitz; M M Goodwin; L E Saltzman; J S Marks
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-06

7.  Physicians' screening practices for female partner abuse during prenatal visits.

Authors:  L Chamberlain; K A Perham-Hester
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2000-06

Review 8.  Intimate partner violence and health: a critique of Canadian prevalence studies.

Authors:  Jocalyn P Clark; Janice Du Mont
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb

9.  Stability and Change in Types of Intimate Partner Violence Across Pre-pregnancy, Pregnancy, and the Postpartum Period.

Authors:  Ceylan Cizmeli; Marci Lobel; Karisa K Harland; Audrey Saftlas
Journal:  Womens Reprod Health (Phila)       Date:  2018-10-24

10.  Violence involving intimate partners: prevalence in Canadian family practice.

Authors:  Farah Ahmad; Sheilah Hogg-Johnson; Donna E Stewart; Wendy Levinson
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.275

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.