Literature DB >> 8219952

Impact of introducing near patient testing for standard investigations in general practice.

E Rink1, S Hilton, A Szczepura, J Fletcher, B Sibbald, C Davies, P Freeling, J Stilwell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical and economic impact of surgery based near patient testing in general practice for six commonly used biochemical and bacteriological tests.
DESIGN: After four months' monitoring, equipment for two bacteriological and four biochemical tests was introduced without cost into 12 practices using a crossover design. Structured request forms were used to monitor laboratory investigations.
SETTING: 12 general practices in west midlands and south west Thames with list sizes above 9000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Investigation rates per 1000 consultations. Changes from baseline rates. Reasons for requesting investigations and provisional diagnoses. Cost per test and sensitivity of costs to rate of use.
RESULTS: Investigation rates for the six tests rose by 16.5% (from 78.6/1000 consultations to 91.6/1000) when equipment was available in the surgery and reverted to baseline rates when it was withdrawn. The average weekly number of tests when equipment was available ranged from 0.5 to 10.5 (mean 9.0). Cholesterol tests were used as an addition to laboratory testing, usually for screening. Midstream urine analysis was often done in the surgery instead of in the laboratory, although 30% of samples were tested by both methods. Doctors' reasons for investigation and conditions tested were largely unaffected by availability of surgery tests. Costs for surgery tests were higher for all tests except midstream urine.
CONCLUSIONS: Availability of surgery based testing increased the number of tests performed. It was cost effective only for midstream urine analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8219952      PMCID: PMC1696428          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6907.775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  7 in total

1.  Comparison of the use of four desktop analysers in six urban general practices.

Authors:  F D Hobbs; P M Broughton; J E Kenkre; G H Thorpe; A Batki
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Near patient testing in general practice: a review.

Authors:  S Hilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Health technology assessment.

Authors:  B Jennett
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-07-11

4.  Guidelines for the clinical and economic evaluation of health care technologies.

Authors:  G Guyatt; M Drummond; D Feeny; P Tugwell; G Stoddart; R B Haynes; K Bennett; R Labelle
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Area variations in the process of care in urban general practice.

Authors:  D Wilkin; D H Metcalfe; L Hallam; M Cooke; P K Hodgkin
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-07-28

6.  Laboratory and radiological investigations in general practice. I-Type requested and rate of use.

Authors:  K A Mills; P M Reilly
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1983-10-08

7.  Influence of patient characteristics on test ordering in general practice.

Authors:  R M Hartley; J R Charlton; C M Harris; B Jarman
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-22
  7 in total
  21 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of near patient test evaluations in primary care.

Authors:  B C Delaney; C J Hyde; R J McManus; S Wilson; D A Fitzmaurice; S Jowett; R Tobias; G H Thorpe; F D Hobbs
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-25

Review 2.  Near patient testing and pathology in the new millennium.

Authors:  M A Crook
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Recommendations for patients undertaking self management of oral anticoagulation.

Authors:  D A Fitzmaurice; S J Machin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-10-27

Review 4.  Point of care testing.

Authors:  C P Price
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-05-26

Review 5.  A systematic review of the effect of primary care-based service innovations on quality and patterns of referral to specialist secondary care.

Authors:  Alex Faulkner; Nicola Mills; David Bainton; Kate Baxter; Paul Kinnersley; Tim J Peters; Deborah Sharp
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Near-patient testing in primary care.

Authors:  David Fitzmaurice
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 7.  Clinical pharmacy in primary care.

Authors:  G M Hawksworth; H Chrystyn
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 8.  Managing demand at the interface between primary and secondary care.

Authors:  A Coulter
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-06-27

9.  Monitoring oral anticoagulation in primary care.

Authors:  D A Fitzmaurice; F D Hobbs; J A Murray
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-06-08

10.  General practice based physiotherapy: its use and effect on referrals to hospital orthopaedics and rheumatology outpatient departments.

Authors:  A O'Cathain; M Froggett; M P Taylor
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.