Literature DB >> 8219938

Precision and accuracy for rat whole body and femur bone mineral determination with dual X-ray absorptiometry.

S Hagiwara1, N Lane, K Engelke, A Sebastian, D B Kimmel, H K Genant.   

Abstract

Precision and accuracy for rat whole body and excised femur bone mineral density (BMD) measurements were evaluated with two dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) systems. The 'small subject' mode on the Norland XR-26 (XR), and the 'ultra high resolution mode' on the Hologic QDR-1000/W(QDR) were used for the analysis. The whole body mode was only available on the XR. The lowest precision error for the whole body was found using a scan resolution of 1.0 x 1.0 mm and a scan speed of 15 mm/s. The scan spatial resolution of the femur measurement was approximately eight times higher on the QDR than on the XR. However, the XR allowed analysis of an arbitrary region of interest within the femur, which was not easily done with the QDR. Precision for the total femur measurement on the QDR (0.5-0.9%) was approximately two to four times superior to that of the XR (1.5-4.3%). The difference may be due to the superior scan resolution of the QDR. Bone mineral content and BMD on the QDR significantly declined with an increase of water depth (P < 0.001). No significant change was observed on the XR. Both DXA systems demonstrated an excellent correlation (r > or = 0.98) with ash weight under the scan conditions examined. The optimal scan condition for the excised femur measurement on the XR was obtained with 1.5-2.5 cm of perspex or water and a scan speed of 10 mm/s. For the QDR, we recommend scanning the rat femur with approximately 2.5 cm of perspex or water in terms of precision and accuracy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8219938     DOI: 10.1016/s0169-6009(08)80081-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone Miner        ISSN: 0169-6009


  7 in total

Review 1.  Current methods and advances in bone densitometry.

Authors:  G Guglielmi; C C Gluer; S Majumdar; B A Blunt; H K Genant
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Prospective use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a model of immobilization and exercise in rats: the preliminary results.

Authors:  Ayce Atalay; Murat Yildirim; Yesim Gokce-Kutsal; Rustu Onur; Macit Ariyurek
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 2.631

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging of trabecular bone structure in the distal radius: relationship with X-ray tomographic microscopy and biomechanics.

Authors:  S Majumdar; D Newitt; A Mathur; D Osman; A Gies; E Chiu; J Lotz; J Kinney; H Genant
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based body volume measurement for 4-compartment body composition.

Authors:  Joseph P Wilson; Kathleen Mulligan; Bo Fan; Jennifer L Sherman; Elizabeth J Murphy; Viva W Tai; Cassidy L Powers; Lorena Marquez; Viviana Ruiz-Barros; John A Shepherd
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2011-11-30       Impact factor: 7.045

5.  The development of femoral osteopenia in ovariectomized rats is not reduced by high intensity treadmill training: a mechanical and densitometric study.

Authors:  L Nordsletten; T S Kaastad; J E Madsen; O Reikerås; R Ovstebø; J H Strømme; J Falch
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.333

6.  Specific evaluation of localized bone mass and bone loss in the rat using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry subregional analysis.

Authors:  P Pastoureau; A Chomel; J Bonnet
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Ratio of trunk to leg volume as a new body shape metric for diabetes and mortality.

Authors:  Joseph P Wilson; Alka M Kanaya; Bo Fan; John A Shepherd
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.