Literature DB >> 8218755

Two different dose regimens of cisapride in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis: a double-blind comparison with ranitidine.

H Geldof1, B Hazelhoff, M H Otten.   

Abstract

We conducted a double-blind study comparing two dosage regimens of a prokinetic drug, cisapride (10 mg q.d.s. and 20 mg b.d.), with a low dose of a H2-receptor antagonist (150 mg ranitidine b.d.) in the treatment of 155 patients with reflux oesophagitis as determined by endoscopy. The active treatment took 8 to 12 weeks depending on whether complete healing was found at endoscopy. Improvement in oesophagitis grades from baseline to endpoint was observed in 68% of patients in the 10 mg cisapride q.d.s. group, 83% in the cisapride 20 mg b.d. group and 81% in the ranitidine group (N.S.). At endpoint, the percentages of endoscopically cured patients with initial grades I or II were 52% for 10 mg cisapride q.d.s., 71% for 20 mg cisapride b.d. and 80% for ranitidine (N.S.). The proportional improvement of the overall reflux symptom score (60%) also showed no significant difference between the three groups. In the treatment of mild reflux oesophagitis (grades I and II) similar results can be expected from 20 mg cisapride b.d. and 150 mg ranitidine b.d. As the results of the two dosage regimens of cisapride were not different, the 20 mg twice daily regimen is preferred because it will improve patient compliance. It is concluded that in reflux oesophagitis grades I and II, the efficacy of 20 mg cisapride b.d. and 150 mg ranitidine b.d. are broadly similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8218755     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.1993.tb00114.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther        ISSN: 0269-2813            Impact factor:   8.171


  10 in total

1.  An evidence-based appraisal of reflux disease management--the Genval Workshop Report.

Authors: 
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  An evidence-based approach to the management of uninvestigated dyspepsia in the era of Helicobacter pylori. Canadian Dyspepsia Working Group.

Authors:  S J Veldhuyzen van Zanten; N Flook; N Chiba; D Armstrong; A Barkun; M Bradette; A Thomson; F Bursey; P Blackshaw; D Frail; P Sinclair
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Economic evaluation of long-term management strategies for erosive oesophagitis.

Authors:  R Goeree; B O'Brien; R Hunt; G Blackhouse; A Willan; J Watson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.981

4.  Cost effectiveness of competing strategies to prevent or treat GORD-related dysphagia.

Authors:  A Sonnenberg
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  A systematic review of symptomatic outcomes used in oesophagitis drug therapy trials.

Authors:  N Sharma; C Donnellan; C Preston; B Delaney; G Duckett; P Moayyedi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 6.  Trends in the management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  J M Lee; C A O'Morain
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.401

7.  Meta-Analyses of Cisapride, Omeprazole and Ranitidine in the Treatment of GORD: Implications for Treating Patient Subgroups.

Authors:  M Iskedjian; T R Einarson
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 8.  Pharmacological management of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  E C Klinkenberg-Knol; H P Festen; S G Meuwissen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 9.  A rational approach to uninvestigated dyspepsia in primary care: review of the literature.

Authors:  N L A Arents; J C Thijs; J H Kleibeuker
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.401

10.  Effects of Rikkunshito (TJ-43) on Esophageal Motor Function and Gastroesophageal Reflux.

Authors:  Terumi Morita; Kenji Furuta; Kyoichi Adachi; Shunji Ohara; Takashi Tanimura; Kenji Koshino; Tomochika Uemura; Kohji Naora; Yoshikazu Kinoshita
Journal:  J Neurogastroenterol Motil       Date:  2012-04-09       Impact factor: 4.924

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.