Literature DB >> 821808

Small intestinal mass of the rat is partially determined by indirect effects of intraluminal nutrition.

L D Dworkin, G M Levine, N J Farber, M H Spector.   

Abstract

Although intraluminal nutrition presumably maintains small intestinal mass by direct contact with the epithelial cells, hormonal or neurovascular elicited by feeding may play an indirect role. In order to test for the presence of indirect factors, Thiry- Vella fistulae were created from the proximal small intestine of two groups of rats. The bypassed gut of a group of rats receiving an elemental diet intravenously was compared to a second group receiving the same diet by intragastric infusion. After 1 week, there was significantly greater (P less than 0.01) gut weight, mucosal weight, DNA content, and protein content of both the gut in continuity and tje bypassed gut of intragastric infused rats. Total sucrase activity was also greater (P less than 0.01) in intragastric fed rats, and this was due to both a greater protein content and specific activity (P is less than 0.05) of the gut in continuity and to the greater protein content of the bypassed gut. Serum gastrin levels were similar (P less than 0.05) in both groups, suggesting that gastrin may not play a role in initiating the differences reported. This study suggests that intraluminal nutrition maintains the small intestinal epithelial population in part, indirectly, by unidentified hormonal or neurovascular stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 821808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastroenterology        ISSN: 0016-5085            Impact factor:   22.682


  18 in total

Review 1.  Enhancing bowel adaptation in short bowel syndrome.

Authors:  Palle Bekker Jeppesen; Per Brobech Mortensen
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2002-08

2.  Randomised controlled study of clinical outcome following trophic feeding.

Authors:  R J McClure; S J Newell
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.747

3.  The effect of faecal diversion on human ileum.

Authors:  Leith Williams; Matthew J Armstrong; Matthew Armstrong; Paul Finan; Peter Sagar; Dermot Burke
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2007-01-17       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Time course of adaptive regulatory peptide changes following massive small bowel resection in the dog.

Authors:  T E Adrian; J S Thompson; E M Quigley
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 5.  Metabolic response to malnutrition: its relevance to enteral feeding.

Authors:  A H Love
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Regulation of gastrointestinal mucosal growth.

Authors:  L R Johnson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1979-08-31       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Trophic response of gut and pancreas after ileojejunal transposition.

Authors:  K U Chu; T Tsuchiya; J Ishizuka; T Uchida; C M Townsend; J C Thompson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Analysis of the effects of food and of digestive secretions on the small intestine of the rat: III. Mucosal mass, activity of brush border enzymes, and in vivo absorption of galactose, sodium, and potassium.

Authors:  R Ecknauer; G Feyerabend; H Raffler
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1978-08       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Small intestinal mucosa changes, including epithelial cell proliferative activity, of children receiving total parenteral nutrition (TPN).

Authors:  T M Rossi; P C Lee; C Young; A Tjota
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Value of in vivo electrophysiological measurements to evaluate canine small bowel autotransplants.

Authors:  M A Meijssen; E Heineman; R W de Bruin; H J Veeze; J Bijman; H R de Jonge; F J ten Kate; R L Marquet; J C Molenaar
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.