Literature DB >> 8218001

An audit of the obstetric outcome of 148 consecutive pregnancies from assisted conception: implications for neonatal services.

P B McFaul1, N Patel, J Mills.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of pregnancy following assisted conception.
DESIGN: Cohort descriptive study.
SETTING: Unit of Reproductive Medicine, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School.
SUBJECTS: One hundred and forty-eight consecutive assisted conceptions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient characteristics and outcome of pregnancy.
RESULTS: Seventy-nine percent of mothers were aged between 26 and 35 years (mean 31.4). The main causes of infertility were tubal (48%), unexplained (35%), anovulatory (8%) and male factor (8%). Primary infertility accounted for 61% of cases and 82% of pregnancies occurred within 3 treatment cycles. Thirty-five (24%) pregnancies miscarried before 14 weeks and 7 (5%) between 15 and 24 weeks gestation. One hundred and three pregnancies resulted in 136 liveborn infants. There was one neonatal death. Thirty-five babies were admitted to SCBU. Antenatally, 13% of patients were admitted to hospital with hypertension and 8% with APH; 50% of multiple and 13% of singleton pregnancies were delivered prematurely, 68% following preterm labour. There were 28 sets of twins (four miscarried at less than 24 weeks) and four sets of triplets. Multiple pregnancy was not associated with cause of infertility, treatment, age or ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Seventy-eight per cent of singletons and 50% of multipara were delivered vaginally.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirm the high incidence of pregnancy loss and preterm delivery associated with assisted conception once allowing for the high rate of multiple pregnancies. The effect of assisted conception programme on health services is discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8218001     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1993.tb14306.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0306-5456


  4 in total

1.  IVF babies with ROP at higher gestational age and birth weight: implications of changing screening criteria.

Authors:  M Minasian; A Fielder
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Are singleton assisted reproductive technology pregnancies at risk of prematurity?

Authors:  T Perri; R Chen; R Yoeli; P Merlob; R Orvieto; Y Shalev; Z Ben-Rafael; I Bar-Hava
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Artificial Reproductive Technology - A Risk Factor for Retinopathy of Prematurity.

Authors:  Kalina Trifonova; Kiril Slaveykov; Hristo Mumdzhiev; Dimitar Dzhelebov
Journal:  Open Access Maced J Med Sci       Date:  2018-11-18

Review 4.  Off to a good start: the influence of pre- and periconceptional exposures, parental fertility, and nutrition on children's health.

Authors:  Robert E Chapin; Wendie A Robbins; Laura A Schieve; Anne M Sweeney; Sonia A Tabacova; Kay M Tomashek
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.