Literature DB >> 8214994

An algorithmic approach to chronic cough.

M R Pratter1, T Bartter, S Akers, J DuBois.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate a stepwise approach to chronic cough that emphasized initial treatment of all patients with an antihistamine-decongestant for postnasal drip and to determine the value of routine bronchoprovocation challenge in the evaluation of chronic cough.
DESIGN: Prospective trial using an algorithm for chronic cough in immunocompetent nonsmoking out-patients.
SETTING: University-based pulmonary practice. PATIENTS: Forty-five patients met the inclusion criteria. The mean duration of cough was 140 weeks (range, 3 to 2080 weeks), and the mean severity of cough as assessed by patients on a four-point scale was "severe."
RESULTS: Marked improvement and resolution (mean, 3.1 and 7.1 weeks, respectively), with resolution in 96% of patients. Antihistamine-decongestant therapy was beneficial in 39 of 45 patients and was the only therapy needed for 16 patients. Bronchoprovocation challenge had a negative predictive value of 100% and a positive predictive value of 74% for cough caused by asthma. No significant relationship was found between the time to cough resolution and duration or severity of cough. Eighteen percent of patients experienced a recurrence of cough at a follow-up interval of 3 months.
CONCLUSIONS: A sequential approach to chronic cough that emphasizes initial treatment with an antihistamine-decongestant is effective. Bronchoprovocation challenge is useful in evaluating patients with chronic cough but can be delayed until the initial response to antihistamine-decongestant therapy has been assessed. The 18% incidence of recurrence highlights the fact that cough often is the manifestation of a chronic or recurring process that requires chronic or episodic therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8214994     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-10-199311150-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  39 in total

Review 1.  [Good sense and nonsense of antitussive agents].

Authors:  A Gillissen; S Tasci; S Ewig; H Schäfer; S Zielen
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 0.743

Review 2.  Cough . 6: Which investigations are most useful in the diagnosis of chronic cough?

Authors:  L P A McGarvey
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 3.  Cough variant asthma: lessons learned from deep inspirations.

Authors:  M Diane Lougheed; Scott E Turcotte; Thomas Fisher
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2011-12-03       Impact factor: 2.584

Review 4.  Cough: an unmet clinical need.

Authors:  Peter V Dicpinigaitis
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 8.739

5.  Recommendations for the management of cough in adults.

Authors:  A H Morice; L McGarvey; I Pavord
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 6.  Non-astmatic Eosinophilic Bronchitis.

Authors:  Tekin Yıldız; Seyhan Dülger
Journal:  Turk Thorac J       Date:  2017-09-27

Review 7.  Twenty year cough in a non-smoker.

Authors:  P Glasziou
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-05-30

Review 8.  Cough. 1: Chronic cough in adults.

Authors:  A H Morice; J A Kastelik
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 9.  Chronic cough. Three most common causes.

Authors:  Anthony D'Urzo; Pieter Jugovic
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 3.275

10.  Effect of the second-generation antihistamine, fexofenadine, on cough reflex sensitivity and pulmonary function.

Authors:  Peter V Dicpinigaitis; Yvonne E Gayle
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.335

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.