BACKGROUND: Opioids inhibit voltage-dependent calcium-channel conductance, which is essential for the nervous system to be able to signal a painful event. Accordingly, interference with calcium-channel conductance may enhance opioid analgesia. The current study was designed to investigate the effects of calcium-channel blocking drugs on the antinociception of morphine at the level of the spinal cord. METHODS: Rats were chronically implanted with catheters in the lumbar intrathecal space. Tail-flick test was used to assess thermal nociception. Intrathecally administered drugs were morphine, calcium-channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem, and nicardipine), or a combination of morphine and calcium-channel blocker. RESULTS: Intrathecal administration of morphine produced a significant dose-dependent antinociception in the tail-flick test. In contrast, intrathecal administration of calcium-channel blockers, verapamil, diltiazem, and nicardipine, did not show any antinociception at the employed doses. However, when intrathecally administered calcium-channel blockers, verapamil (50 micrograms), diltiazem (100 micrograms), or nicardipine (20 micrograms), were combined with ineffective (0.25, 0.5, 1, or 2 micrograms) or moderately effective (5 micrograms) doses of intrathecally administered morphine, significant antinociception was produced. These interactions were synergistic. There were no significant changes in MAP or HR after the intrathecal administration of 200 micrograms verapamil or 2 micrograms morphine combined with 50 micrograms verapamil. CONCLUSIONS: The authors interpreted these results to indicate that calcium-channel blocking drugs synergistically potentiate the analgesic effects of morphine at the level of the spinal cord. Before these results can be translated into clinical use, however, adequate toxicity studies must be conducted to examine the effect of the perispinal administration of calcium-channel blocking drugs on spinal cord function.
BACKGROUND: Opioids inhibit voltage-dependent calcium-channel conductance, which is essential for the nervous system to be able to signal a painful event. Accordingly, interference with calcium-channel conductance may enhance opioid analgesia. The current study was designed to investigate the effects of calcium-channel blocking drugs on the antinociception of morphine at the level of the spinal cord. METHODS:Rats were chronically implanted with catheters in the lumbar intrathecal space. Tail-flick test was used to assess thermal nociception. Intrathecally administered drugs were morphine, calcium-channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem, and nicardipine), or a combination of morphine and calcium-channel blocker. RESULTS: Intrathecal administration of morphine produced a significant dose-dependent antinociception in the tail-flick test. In contrast, intrathecal administration of calcium-channel blockers, verapamil, diltiazem, and nicardipine, did not show any antinociception at the employed doses. However, when intrathecally administered calcium-channel blockers, verapamil (50 micrograms), diltiazem (100 micrograms), or nicardipine (20 micrograms), were combined with ineffective (0.25, 0.5, 1, or 2 micrograms) or moderately effective (5 micrograms) doses of intrathecally administered morphine, significant antinociception was produced. These interactions were synergistic. There were no significant changes in MAP or HR after the intrathecal administration of 200 micrograms verapamil or 2 micrograms morphine combined with 50 micrograms verapamil. CONCLUSIONS: The authors interpreted these results to indicate that calcium-channel blocking drugs synergistically potentiate the analgesic effects of morphine at the level of the spinal cord. Before these results can be translated into clinical use, however, adequate toxicity studies must be conducted to examine the effect of the perispinal administration of calcium-channel blocking drugs on spinal cord function.
Authors: Jeong Jin Lee; Jie Ae Kim; Hyun Joo Ahn; Jin-Kyoung Kim; Mikyung Yang; Soo Joo Choi; Hyun-Soo Kim; Soo Hyun Yang Journal: Korean J Anesthesiol Date: 2010-10-21