Literature DB >> 8214669

Predictive accuracy of continuous alfentanil infusion in volunteers: variability of different pharmacokinetic sets.

L Barvais1, F Cantraine, A D'Hollander, E Coussaert.   

Abstract

To evaluate the variability of the predictive accuracy of alfentanil by using different pharmacokinetic data sets, eight healthy young male adult volunteers were given the same alfentanil infusion for 4 h. Nineteen venous blood samples were taken from each volunteer, and alfentanil concentrations were titrated by radioimmunoassay. For each volunteer, the pharmacokinetic variables of a two-compartment model were calculated, averaged, and considered as a reference set. Based on the infusion profile given to the volunteers, central compartment concentrations were calculated by using the reference set and nine previously published pharmacokinetic sets of alfentanil concentrations in healthy adults. The bias, inaccuracy, and dispersion of each data set were assessed by determining the median performance error, the median absolute performance error (MDAPE) and the 10th and 90th percentiles, respectively. By using the pharmacokinetic variables of the volunteers, the predictive accuracy was excellent (MDAPE, 7.25%). Among the 10 averaged pharmacokinetic sets, there was a significant correlation between their bias and clearance (R2 = 0.996). The reference set had the best predictive accuracy (MDAPE, 23.6%). Five sets from the literature also showed a reliable predictive accuracy but four other sets with a clearance more than 5 mL.kg-1.min-1 and derived from a large bolus injection were inaccurate (MDAPE > 50%) as they underestimated the alfentanil concentrations. We conclude that pharmacokinetic sets derived from large bolus should not be selected to accurately predict alfentanil infusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8214669     DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199310000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  3 in total

Review 1.  Target-controlled infusion systems: role in anaesthesia and analgesia.

Authors:  M C van den Nieuwenhuyzen; F H Engbers; J Vuyk; A G Burm
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Induction speed is not a determinant of propofol pharmacodynamics.

Authors:  Anthony G Doufas; Maryam Bakhshandeh; Andrew R Bjorksten; Steven L Shafer; Daniel I Sessler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Determination of the distribution volume that can be used to calculate the intravenous loading dose.

Authors:  D R Wada; D R Drover; H J Lemmens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 6.447

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.