BACKGROUND: Little is known about the emotional impact of physician-initiated advance directive discussions. METHODS:One hundred ambulatory patients aged 65 years and older were randomly assigned to receive either a physician-initiated discussion of advance directive choices of a discussion of health promotion issues. Prediscussion, immediate postdiscussion, and 1-week postdiscussion measures of positive and negative affect were measured for both groups. RESULTS: Neither discussion topic resulted in adverse emotional or attitudinal responses. Only the advance directive participants showed positive affective and attitudinal responses to the discussion, including an increase in positive affect, an increased sense of physician-patient understanding, and increased thought and discussion about life-support issues in the week following the discussion. For those participants receiving the advance directive discussion, longer physician-patient relationships and higher educational levels significantly predicted a more positive affective response. Lower scores on indices of mental and physical health and a stronger belief that physicians should discuss advance directive issues significantly predicted a more negative affective response to the advance directive discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should anticipate positive emotional responses when they initiate advance directive discussions with their elderly outpatients. Advance directive discussions will be received most positively by patients who enjoy good psychological and physical health and when initiated in the context of an established physician-patient relationship.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Little is known about the emotional impact of physician-initiated advance directive discussions. METHODS: One hundred ambulatory patients aged 65 years and older were randomly assigned to receive either a physician-initiated discussion of advance directive choices of a discussion of health promotion issues. Prediscussion, immediate postdiscussion, and 1-week postdiscussion measures of positive and negative affect were measured for both groups. RESULTS: Neither discussion topic resulted in adverse emotional or attitudinal responses. Only the advance directive participants showed positive affective and attitudinal responses to the discussion, including an increase in positive affect, an increased sense of physician-patient understanding, and increased thought and discussion about life-support issues in the week following the discussion. For those participants receiving the advance directive discussion, longer physician-patient relationships and higher educational levels significantly predicted a more positive affective response. Lower scores on indices of mental and physical health and a stronger belief that physicians should discuss advance directive issues significantly predicted a more negative affective response to the advance directive discussion. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians should anticipate positive emotional responses when they initiate advance directive discussions with their elderly outpatients. Advance directive discussions will be received most positively by patients who enjoy good psychological and physical health and when initiated in the context of an established physician-patient relationship.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Family Practice Center of Akron
Authors: Rebecca E Ryan; Michael Connolly; Natalie K Bradford; Simon Henderson; Anthony Herbert; Lina Schonfeld; Jeanine Young; Josephine I Bothroyd; Amanda Henderson Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2022-07-08
Authors: Ellen P McCarthy; Michael J Pencina; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Jane C Evans; Elizabeth J Oberacker; Ralph B D'Agostino; Risa B Burns; Joanne M Murabito Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2008-09 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Benzi M Kluger; Jo Shattuck; Julie Berk; Kelly Sebring; Wallace Jones; Fabian Brunetti; Isabel Fairmont; Daniel W Bowles; Stefan Sillau; David B Bekelman Journal: Mov Disord Clin Pract Date: 2018-11-16
Authors: Jenny J Ko; Mark S Ballard; Tamara Shenkier; Jessica Simon; Amanda Roze des Ordons; Gillian Fyles; Shilo Lefresne; Philippa Hawley; Charlie Chen; Michael McKenzie; Isabella Ghement; Justin J Sanders; Rachelle Bernacki; Scott Jones Journal: Palliat Med Rep Date: 2020-11-24