Literature DB >> 8213139

Recovery from low back pain. 1-5 year follow-up of 287 injury-related cases.

C G Greenough1.   

Abstract

This study investigated the factors affecting recovery from low back injury. The study population was designed to be representative of patients presenting with back pain following soft tissue injury. A minimum follow up rate of 90 percent was achieved with a length of elapsed time from the injury of up to five years. Three established methods of assessment of disability and functional capacity (The Oswestry disability scale, The Waddell disability scale and The Waddell physical impairment rating) were compared to each other and a new scale (The Low-Back Outcome Scale) for the measurement of a patient's performance in employment, social activities and activities of daily living. The relationships of these scales to employment, psychological disturbance and other factors were defined. The Outcome Score designed for use in this study provided a comprehensive and discriminating assessment of patient function. Compensation (particularly lump sum claims), psychological disturbance at review, time off work, and age at injury were important factors in recovery; the diagnosis, type and severity of injury, migrant status and neurological deficits were not. Eight psychometric instruments were examined, and the combination of The Zung Depression Scale and The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire was found to be the most accurate in determining the presence of psychological disturbance in patients with low back pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8213139

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl        ISSN: 0300-8827


  9 in total

Review 1.  Nonoperative versus operative treatment for thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic deficit: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sonali R Gnanenthiran; Sam Adie; Ian A Harris
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-11-05       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Comparing hospital and chiropractic treatment for back pain. Results were clinically trivial.

Authors:  C G Greenough
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-11-11

Review 3.  Outcome assessment: recommendations for daily practice.

Authors:  Charles G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-11-29       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Anterior lumbar fusion: results, assessment techniques and prognostic factors.

Authors:  C G Greenough; L J Taylor; R D Fraser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Correlation of PROMIS Physical Function and Pain CAT Instruments With Oswestry Disability Index and Neck Disability Index in Spine Patients.

Authors:  Mark O Papuga; Addisu Mesfin; Robert Molinari; Paul T Rubery
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2016-07-15       Impact factor: 3.241

6.  Physical activity and the mediating effect of fear, depression, anxiety, and catastrophizing on pain related disability in people with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Paul W M Marshall; Siobhan Schabrun; Michael F Knox
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Efficacy of classification-based cognitive functional therapy in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  K Vibe Fersum; P O'Sullivan; J S Skouen; A Smith; A Kvåle
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2012-12-04       Impact factor: 3.931

8.  Somatic perception, cultural differences and immigration: results from administration of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ) to a sample of immigrants.

Authors:  Nicola Luigi Bragazzi; Giovanni Del Puente; Werner Maria Natta
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2014-06-12

9.  Abnormal Pain Response After a Compensable Shoulder Injury.

Authors:  Helen Razmjou; Dragana Boljanovic; Amr Elmaraghy; Iona Macritchie; Carolyn Roknic; Danielle Medeiros; Robin R Richards
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2017-11-20
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.