Literature DB >> 8211366

Outcome assessment after epidural corticosteroid injection for low back pain and sciatica.

S J Bowman1, L Wedderburn, A Whaley, R Grahame, S Newman.   

Abstract

Epidural corticosteroid injection is a relatively effective treatment for low back pain and sciatica with a low incidence of side effects, although the patient's perspective in terms of outcome and satisfaction has not been studied well. The assessment of outcome in low back pain patients is complex. Three types of measure were compared: 1) a clinical score, 2) patient ratings of pain and disability, and 3) patient satisfaction ratings. There were significant discrepancies among the results. Consequently, clinical trials using different outcome measures may reach different conclusions. It therefore is vital to have planned the study carefully in advance, considering the questions to be asked, especially in this area, where patient-derived measures (e.g., "patient satisfaction") are so important. This study of 35 patients showed a fall in clinical signs/symptoms, disability, and pain 1 week after the injection, with maintenance of the reduction in disability at 3 months. Eighty-five percent reported at least some improvement at 1 week and 43% had improvement lasting 3 months. Patients with a more depressed mood had higher levels of disability both before and after the procedure. Anxiety before the procedure did not adversely affect outcome, and it was well tolerated by most patients. At 3 months 83% were satisfied with the treatment they had received and a patient satisfaction questionnaire gave similar results. We continue to recommend this treatment as a well-tolerated procedure, with which most patients are satisfied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8211366     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199308000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

Review 1.  Intraspinal steroids: history, efficacy, accidentality, and controversy with review of United States Food and Drug Administration reports.

Authors:  D A Nelson; W M Landau
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 10.154

2.  Incorrect needle position during lumbar epidural steroid administration: inaccuracy of loss of air pressure resistance and requirement of fluoroscopy and epidurography during needle insertion.

Authors:  Walter S Bartynski; Stephen Z Grahovac; William E Rothfus
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Interventional pain medicine: retreat from the biopsychosocial model of pain.

Authors:  Randy S Roth; Michael E Geisser; David A Williams
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  The flow patterns of caudal epidural in upper lumbar spinal pathology.

Authors:  M Cleary; C Keating; A R Poynton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Immediate pain response to interlaminar lumbar epidural steroid administration: response characteristics and effects of anesthetic concentration.

Authors:  W S Bartynski; R B Jennings; W E Rothfus; V Agarwal
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-07-05       Impact factor: 3.825

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.